BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34051683)

  • 61. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in the activity staging of terminal ileum Crohn's disease.
    Wu YC; Xiao ZB; Lin XH; Zheng XY; Cao DR; Zhang ZS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Oct; 26(39):6057-6073. PubMed ID: 33132655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Treatment Response for Cervical Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
    Lu H; Wu Y; Liu X; Huang H; Jiang H; Zhu C; Man Y; Liu P; Li X; Chen Z; Long X; Pang Q; Deng S; Gu J
    Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():6065-6078. PubMed ID: 34377025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Influence of menstrual status and pathological type on the apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: a primary study.
    Dong Y; Dong RT; Zhang XM; Song QL; Yu T; Hong Luo Y
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Mar; 62(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 32536261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume versus ADC histogram: prognostic value of tumour treatment response and survival in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.
    Ueno Y; Lisbona R; Tamada T; Alaref A; Sugimura K; Reinhold C
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20170035. PubMed ID: 28508679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Volumetric assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient predicts outcome following chemoradiation for cervical cancer.
    Ho JC; Fang P; Cardenas CE; Mohamed ASR; Fuller CD; Allen PK; Bhosale PR; Frumovitz MM; Jhingran A; Klopp AH
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Jun; 135():58-64. PubMed ID: 31015171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Value of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting extramural venous invasion in locally advanced gastric cancer and prognostic significance.
    Zhu Y; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Xue L; Li Y; Jiang J; Zhong Y; Wang S; Jiang L
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 Jan; 11(1):328-340. PubMed ID: 33392032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Application of apparent diffusion coefficient values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing different sized metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancers.
    Zhang A; Song J; Ma Z; Chen T
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Jun; 61(6):848-855. PubMed ID: 31615267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Lindgren A; Anttila M; Arponen O; Rautiainen S; Könönen M; Vanninen R; Sallinen H
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():66-73. PubMed ID: 31084761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.
    Takekuma M; Kasamatsu Y; Kado N; Kuji S; Tanaka A; Takahashi N; Abe M; Hirashima Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Aug; 21(4):741-747. PubMed ID: 26857458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Prognostic Value of the Sum of Metabolic Tumor Volume of Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
    Hong JH; Min KJ; Lee JK; So KA; Jung US; Kim S; Eo JS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(9):e2992. PubMed ID: 26945420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence.
    Nakamura K; Joja I; Nagasaka T; Fukushima C; Kusumoto T; Seki N; Hongo A; Kodama J; Hiramatsu Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Dec; 127(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 22892362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Combining standardized uptake value of FDG-PET and apparent diffusion coefficient of DW-MRI improves risk stratification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Preda L; Conte G; Bonello L; Giannitto C; Travaini LL; Raimondi S; Summers PE; Mohssen A; Alterio D; Cossu Rocca M; Grana C; Ruju F; Bellomi M
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4432-4441. PubMed ID: 26965504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Prognostic Value of Severe Lymphopenia During Pelvic Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Cervical Cancer.
    Cho O; Chun M; Chang SJ; Oh YT; Noh OK
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Jul; 36(7):3541-7. PubMed ID: 27354621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Maximum standardized lymph node uptake value could be an important predictor of recurrence and survival in patients with cervical cancer.
    Nakamura K; Joja I; Nagasaka T; Haruma T; Hiramatsu Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Feb; 173():77-82. PubMed ID: 24275232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for monitoring early response in patients with advanced cervical cancers undergoing concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.
    Meng J; Zhu L; Zhu L; Ge Y; He J; Zhou Z; Yang X
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 28273745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for posttherapy evaluation in patients with advanced cervical cancer receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    Su TP; Lin G; Huang YT; Liu FY; Wang CC; Chao A; Chou HH; Yen TC; Lai CH
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):727-734. PubMed ID: 29159572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Prognostic analysis of stage Ⅰb2 andⅡa2 cervical squamous cancer without high risk factors treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy].
    Li PP; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH; Zhang YN; Zhang R; Bai P; Li XG; Wu LY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 53(4):248-256. PubMed ID: 29747270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data of locally advanced cervical carcinoma with the Brix model.
    Lund KV; Simonsen TG; Kristensen GB; Rofstad EK
    Acta Oncol; 2019 Jun; 58(6):828-837. PubMed ID: 30810443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Prognostic significance of tumor response as assessed by sequential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography during concurrent chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer.
    Oh D; Lee JE; Huh SJ; Park W; Nam H; Choi JY; Kim BT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 24074928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.