206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34051899)
1. Craniosynostosis: Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis.
Mittermiller PA; Flores RL; Staffenberg DA
Clin Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 48(3):473-485. PubMed ID: 34051899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Achieving differential facial changes with Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: the use of nasal passenger grafts, cerclage hinges, and segmental movements.
Hopper RA; Prucz RB; Iamphongsai S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Dec; 130(6):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 22878478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The assessment of midface distraction osteogenesis in treatment of upper airway obstruction.
Xu H; Yu Z; Mu X
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1876-81. PubMed ID: 19816368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rigid External Distractor Aided Conventional Le Fort III Osteotomy Advancement in Adult With Severe Midfacial Hypoplasia.
Wang R; Liu C
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e59-62. PubMed ID: 26703038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A subcranial Le Fort III advancement with distraction osteogenesis as a clinical strategy to approach pycnodysostosis with midface retrusion and exorbitism.
Raposo-Amaral CE; Tong A; Denadai R; Yalom A; Raposo-Amaral CA; Bertola D; Li A; Jarrahy R
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1327-30. PubMed ID: 23851800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Airway changes following Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis for syndromic craniosynostosis: a clinical and cephalometric study.
Flores RL; Shetye PR; Zeitler D; Bernstein J; Wang E; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Aug; 124(2):590-601. PubMed ID: 19644279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?
Engel M; Berger M; Hoffmann J; Kühle R; Rückschloss T; Ristow O; Freudlsperger C; Kansy K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30642732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature.
Nout E; Cesteleyn LL; van der Wal KG; van Adrichem LN; Mathijssen IM; Wolvius EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 37(9):781-9. PubMed ID: 18486452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Hosaka Y
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1019-28. PubMed ID: 12621171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monobloc minus Le Fort II for single-stage treatment of the Apert phenotype.
Paliga JT; Goldstein JA; Storm PB; Taylor JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1380-2. PubMed ID: 24015416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Le Fort IV + I distraction osteogenesis using an internal device for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Sakamoto Y; Nakajima H; Tamada I; Sakamoto T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):788-95. PubMed ID: 24280175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Compression-distraction osteosynthesis in management of children with craniosynostoses].
Roginskiĭ VV; Komeliagin DIu; Satanin LA; Gorelyshev SK; Ivanov AL
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2009; (2):35-42; discussion 42. PubMed ID: 19569547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perinasal Osteotomy With Distraction Osteogenesis for a Mild Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Kobayashi S; Fukawa T; Yasumura K; Satake T; Maegawa J
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):50-52. PubMed ID: 30418289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.
Mathijssen I; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Mireau E; Morisseau-Durand MP; Guérin P; Renier D
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 17(4):642-4. PubMed ID: 16877907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis in syndromal craniosynostosis.
Meling TR; Hans-Erik H; Per S; Due-Tonnessen BJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 16432404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additional orthognathic surgery following Le Fort III and monobloc advancement.
Nout E; Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB; Van der Wal KG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):679-84. PubMed ID: 21398092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Le Fort II midfacial distraction combined with orthognathic surgery in the treatment of nasomaxillary hypoplasia.
Yu H; Dai J; Wang X; Zhang W; Shen SG
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):e241-4. PubMed ID: 24777005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vector control in internal midface distraction using temporary anchorage devices.
Francis C; Rommer E; Mancho S; Carey J; Hammoudeh JA; Urata MM
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2000-3. PubMed ID: 23154368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
