These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34052028)

  • 1. Knife-edged crown fabricated by 3-dimensional gel deposition and soft milling.
    Li R; Li W; Wang Y; Sun Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 34052028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of stereolithography and milling in fabricating monolithic zirconia crowns with different finish line designs.
    Li R; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun Y
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104255. PubMed ID: 33340775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of fit and accuracy of single crowns fabricated from self-glazed zirconia compared with milled zirconia.
    Marouki C; Shamon A; Svanborg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 36959004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional trueness and margin quality of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition.
    Li R; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Shen Z; Sun Y
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):478-484. PubMed ID: 32063530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3-dimensional gel deposition.
    Sun Z; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zheng Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 35135676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition.
    Li Y; Zhao J; Sun Z; Lin N; Zheng Y
    Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35095041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Milling Protocols on Trueness and Precision of Ceramic Crowns.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al-Rashdan RB; Al-Rashdan BA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 32856358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of modifying occlusal cement spacer on the fit accuracy of digitally manufactured zirconia crowns.
    Ibrahim H; El Kateb M; Morsy N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):93.e1-93.e6. PubMed ID: 37867014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study.
    Lerner H; Nagy K; Pranno N; Zarone F; Admakin O; Mangano F
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103792. PubMed ID: 34481929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of CAD-CAM tool deterioration on the trueness of ceramic restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan RB; Al Rashdan BA; Al Quran FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 33342613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective analysis of 102 zirconia single crowns with knife-edge margins.
    Poggio CE; Dosoli R; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 May; 107(5):316-21. PubMed ID: 22546309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate.
    Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing.
    Wang W; Yu H; Liu Y; Jiang X; Gao B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 30017167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of zirconia crowns manufactured by stereolithography with an occlusal full-supporting structure: An in vitro study.
    Li R; Xu T; Wang Y; Sun Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):902-907. PubMed ID: 35183363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.