182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34052776)
1. Recent progress on the prospective application of machine learning to structure-based virtual screening.
Ghislat G; Rahman T; Ballester PJ
Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2021 Dec; 65():28-34. PubMed ID: 34052776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A practical guide to machine-learning scoring for structure-based virtual screening.
Tran-Nguyen VK; Junaid M; Simeon S; Ballester PJ
Nat Protoc; 2023 Nov; 18(11):3460-3511. PubMed ID: 37845361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of compound library size on the performance of scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening.
Fresnais L; Ballester PJ
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32568385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.
Xiong GL; Ye WL; Shen C; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Topology-Based and Conformation-Based Decoys Database: An Unbiased Online Database for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Wang T; Kang Y; Li D; Pan P; Wang J; Wang G; Deng Y; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T; Wang Z
J Med Chem; 2023 Jul; 66(13):9174-9183. PubMed ID: 37317043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?
Shen C; Weng G; Zhang X; Leung EL; Yao X; Pang J; Chai X; Li D; Wang E; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33418562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beware of the generic machine learning-based scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Pang J; Wang G; Zhong H; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32484221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting machine-learning scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening.
Ballester PJ
Drug Discov Today Technol; 2019 Dec; 32-33():81-87. PubMed ID: 33386098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.
Yang C; Chen EA; Zhang Y
Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Protein Structure and Sequence Similarity on the Accuracy of Machine-Learning Scoring Functions for Binding Affinity Prediction.
Li H; Peng J; Leung Y; Leung KS; Wong MH; Lu G; Ballester PJ
Biomolecules; 2018 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 29538331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening Ability by Integrating Multiple Energy Auxiliary Terms from Molecular Docking Scoring.
Ye WL; Shen C; Xiong GL; Ding JJ; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4216-4230. PubMed ID: 32352294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.
Ji B; He X; Zhai J; Zhang Y; Man VH; Wang J
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33758923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational representations of protein-ligand interfaces for structure-based virtual screening.
Qin T; Zhu Z; Wang XS; Xia J; Wu S
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2021 Oct; 16(10):1175-1192. PubMed ID: 34011222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
Scantlebury J; Vost L; Carbery A; Hadfield TE; Turnbull OM; Brown N; Chenthamarakshan V; Das P; Grosjean H; von Delft F; Deane CM
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2960-2974. PubMed ID: 37166179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MetaScore: A Novel Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Improve Traditional Scoring Functions for Scoring Protein-Protein Docking Conformations.
Jung Y; Geng C; Bonvin AMJJ; Xue LC; Honavar VG
Biomolecules; 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36671507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved Method of Structure-Based Virtual Screening via Interaction-Energy-Based Learning.
Yasuo N; Sekijima M
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 30808172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can machine learning consistently improve the scoring power of classical scoring functions? Insights into the role of machine learning in scoring functions.
Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Zhong H; Wang G; Yao X; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jan; 22(1):497-514. PubMed ID: 31982914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
