These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34053275)

  • 1. Mid-term results of tibial cones : reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection.
    Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Ryan SP; Bolognesi MP
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):158-164. PubMed ID: 34053275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years.
    Carender CN; Bothun CE; Taunton MJ; Perry KI; Bedard NA; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Sep; 106(18):1688-1696. PubMed ID: 38875316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship.
    Hadley ML; Harmer JR; Wright BH; Larson DR; Abdel MP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 38677340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
    Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Bedard NA; Cates RA; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):116-122. PubMed ID: 32475283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diaphyseal Impaction Grafting Combined with Metaphyseal Cones: Outcomes in 88 Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties.
    Bedard NA; Dugdale EM; Couch CC; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Jul; 106(14):1293-1299. PubMed ID: 38691581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early outcomes of a modern cemented total knee arthroplasty : is tibial loosening a concern?
    Yang J; Heckmann ND; Nahhas CR; Salzano MB; Ruzich GP; Jacobs JJ; Paprosky WG; Rosenberg AG; Nam D
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):51-58. PubMed ID: 34053274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
    Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
    Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE
    Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss.
    Zitsch BP; Salaymeh JK; Burdyny MR; Buckner BC; Lyden ER; Konigsberg BS; Garvin KL; Hartman CW
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S256-S262. PubMed ID: 38604279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic and clinical analysis of a Porous-coated metaphyseal cone for revision total Knee arthroplasty.
    Guntin J; Bartosiak KA; Della Valle CJ; Patel A; Gerlinger TL; Nam D
    Knee; 2022 Aug; 37():162-170. PubMed ID: 35803170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Varus-Valgus Constrained Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean Clinical Follow-Up of Six Years.
    Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Wellman SS; Jiranek WA; Seyler TM
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7S):S303-S307. PubMed ID: 33558046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early Survivorship of Newly Designed Highly Porous Metaphyseal Tibial Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Chalmers BP; Malfer CM; Mayman DJ; Westrich GH; Sculco PK; Bostrom MP; Jerabek SA
    Arthroplast Today; 2021 Apr; 8():5-10. PubMed ID: 33665275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
    Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.