BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34053294)

  • 1. Unexpected high rate of revision of a modern cemented fixed bearing modular posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Steele JR; Wellman SS
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):137-144. PubMed ID: 34053294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early outcomes of a modern cemented total knee arthroplasty : is tibial loosening a concern?
    Yang J; Heckmann ND; Nahhas CR; Salzano MB; Ruzich GP; Jacobs JJ; Paprosky WG; Rosenberg AG; Nam D
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):51-58. PubMed ID: 34053274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision to TKA: Are Tibial Stems and Augments Associated With Improved Survivorship?
    Lewis PL; Davidson DC; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Donnelly W; Cuthbert A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):854-862. PubMed ID: 29481343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
    Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note.
    Schwartz AJ; Della Valle CJ; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Berger RA; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Aug; 468(8):2160-7. PubMed ID: 20440662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
    Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid-term results of tibial cones : reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection.
    Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Ryan SP; Bolognesi MP
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):158-164. PubMed ID: 34053275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pain associated with cemented and uncemented long-stemmed tibial components in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Larson DJ; Rosenberg JH; Lawlor MA; Garvin KL; Hartman CW; Lyden E; Konigsberg BS
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):165-170. PubMed ID: 34053295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of revision for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty according to fixation and bearing type : short- to mid-term results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Burger JA; Zuiderbaan HA; Sierevelt IN; van Steenbergen L; Nolte PA; Pearle AD; Kerkhoffs GMMJ
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 34192933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantage of minimal anterior knee pain and long-term survivorship of cemented single radius posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing.
    Ji HM; Ha YC; Baek JH; Ko YB
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2015 Mar; 7(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 25729519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High rate of radiolucent lines following the cemented original design of the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty.
    Prodromidis AD; Chloros GD; Thivaios GC; Sutton PM; Pandit H; Giannoudis PV; Charalambous CP
    Bone Joint J; 2023 Jun; 105-B(6):610-621. PubMed ID: 37259548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral osteotomy long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes.
    Chalmers BP; Limberg AK; Athey AG; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6):660-666. PubMed ID: 31154844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aseptic tibial debonding as a cause of early failure in a modern total knee arthroplasty design.
    Arsoy D; Pagnano MW; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD; Sierra RJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jan; 471(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 22790529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliable outcomes and survivorship of primary total knee arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the knee.
    Chalmers BP; Mehrotra KG; Sierra RJ; Pagnano MW; Taunton MJ; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Nov; 101-B(11):1356-1361. PubMed ID: 31674235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
    Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparable mid-term revision rates of primary cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties in 201,211 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2017).
    Quispel CR; Duivenvoorden T; Beekhuizen SR; Verburg H; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Van Steenbergen LN; Pasma JH; De Ridder R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Oct; 29(10):3400-3408. PubMed ID: 32862239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Hampton M; Mansoor J; Getty J; Sutton PM
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 32731836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.
    Hwang SC; Kong JY; Nam DC; Kim DH; Park HB; Jeong ST; Cho SH
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2010 Jun; 2(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 20514269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is a full component revision necessary for isolated tibial loosening?
    Martin JR; Geary MB; Ransone M; Macknet D; Fehring K; Fehring T
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):123-128. PubMed ID: 32475265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Hernigou P; Deschamps G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 14996875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.