230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34054768)
1.
Stuermer EK; Plattfaut I; Dietrich M; Brill F; Kampe A; Wiencke V; Ulatowski A; Geffken M; Rembe JD; Naumova EA; Debus SE; Smeets R
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():664030. PubMed ID: 34054768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings.
Robertson SN; Romero M; Fenn S; Kohler Riedi PL; Cámara M
J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative Insights and Visualization of Antimicrobial Tolerance in Mixed-Species Biofilms.
Dittmer M; Brill FHH; Kampe A; Geffken M; Rembe JD; Moll R; Alio I; Streit WR; Debus ES; Smeets R; Stuermer EK
Biomedicines; 2023 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 37893014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with antibacterial dressings or antiseptics on an in vitro wound model.
Matiasek J; Domig KJ; Djedovic G; Babeluk R; Assadian O
J Wound Care; 2017 May; 26(5):236-242. PubMed ID: 28475440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical impact of an anti-biofilm Hydrofiber dressing in hard-to-heal wounds previously managed with traditional antimicrobial products and systemic antibiotics.
Metcalf DG; Bowler PG
Burns Trauma; 2020; 8():tkaa004. PubMed ID: 32341917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antimicrobial Hypochlorous Wound Irrigation Solutions Demonstrate Lower Anti-biofilm Efficacy Against Bacterial Biofilm in a Complex
Rembe JD; Huelsboemer L; Plattfaut I; Besser M; Stuermer EK
Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():564513. PubMed ID: 33162949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ag5IO6: novel antibiofilm activity of a silver compound with application to medical devices.
Incani V; Omar A; Prosperi-Porta G; Nadworny P
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Jun; 45(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 25604278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro prevention and inactivation of biofilms using controlled-release iodine foam dressings for wound healing.
Watson F; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14365. PubMed ID: 37715349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.
Lipp C; Kirker K; Agostinho A; James G; Stewart P
J Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 19(6):220-6. PubMed ID: 20551862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
Phillips PL; Yang Q; Davis S; Sampson EM; Azeke JI; Hamad A; Schultz GS
Int Wound J; 2015 Aug; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anti-biofilm effects and healing promotion by silver oxynitrate-based dressings.
Doherty C; Byrne CV; Baqader S; El-Chami C; McBain AJ; Thomason HA
Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2014. PubMed ID: 36737464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of hypochloric acid on
Liu J; Wu BL; Zhu WZ; Liu J; Wang T; Geng MM; Bai L; Liu Y
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 38(3):242-250. PubMed ID: 35325969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSING.
Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler IP
Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27220190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vitro Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose Dressings Chemisorbed with Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Pathogens Isolated from Chronic Wounds.
Dydak K; Junka A; Dydak A; Brożyna M; Paleczny J; Fijalkowski K; Kubielas G; Aniołek O; Bartoszewicz M
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33924416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings on wound microorganisms using an in vitro biofilm model.
Percival SL; Bowler PG; Dolman J
Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 17651233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
