These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3405596)

  • 1. Noninvasive extratympanic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Liard P; Pelizzone M; Rohr A; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1988; 50(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 3405596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system of deaf patients.
    Counter SA; Borg E; Bredberg G; Linde G; Vainio M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Sep; 114(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 7825431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode.
    Khan S; Raine CH; Becconsall K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():190-2. PubMed ID: 7668631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumor patients.
    Lambert PR; Ruth RA; Thomas JF
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jul; 102(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 1614252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploratory cochleotomy. Assessment of auditory nerve excitability and anatomical conditions in cochlear implant candidates.
    Montandon P; Kasper A; Pelizzone M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 1475098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection. The use of ear canal electrodes versus transtympanic electrodes.
    Spies TH; Snik AF; Mens LH; van den Broek P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Sep; 113(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8266782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory brainstem potentials in man evoked by electrical stimulation of the round window.
    Chouard CH; Meyer B; Donadieu F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(3-4):287-93. PubMed ID: 443011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Paired pulse discrimination test for evaluating auditory nerve function in deaf patients with cochlear prostheses].
    Yun JT; Chang Y; Wang ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1986 Aug; 8(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 2953476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative assessment of function of the auditory nerve using electroaudiometry and a notched-noise auditory brain stem response technique.
    Wagner H; Gerhardt HJ; Stürzebecher E; Werbs M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():198-201. PubMed ID: 7668635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills.
    Tong YC; Busby PA; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):951-62. PubMed ID: 3183213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evoked potentials from the auditory nerve following sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea: new possibilities for preoperative testing in cochlear-implant candidates?
    Hartmann R; Pfennigdorff T; Klinke R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Sep; 114(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7825430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech processing for cochlear implant prostheses.
    Millar JB; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):280-96. PubMed ID: 6547495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sound sensations produced by electric stimulation of the structures of the middle ear and the tympanic chord].
    Michel J; Verain A
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1975; 92(1-2):33-60. PubMed ID: 766693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain stem evoked responses by intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Robier A; Lescao Y; Beutter P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():120-4. PubMed ID: 8273465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory-nerve potentials from ear canals of patients with otologic problems.
    Montandon PB; Shepard NT; Marr EM; Peake WT; TKiang NY
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(2 PART 1):164-73. PubMed ID: 1124903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Status of the development of cochlear prostheses relying on electric stimulation].
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989; 34(7-8):168-76. PubMed ID: 2775823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients.
    Van Hoesel RJ; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():233-5. PubMed ID: 7668650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.