These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34057032)

  • 1. Reinstating Over-Pouring Behavior: Importance of the Imagined Drinking Context.
    Bauer MR; Hasenberg W; Bakalars C; Mittleman G; Matthews DB
    Subst Use Misuse; 2021; 56(9):1374-1382. PubMed ID: 34057032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Singaporean college students overpour drinks similar to Western populations: influence of peer presence in a simulated alcohol-pouring task.
    Zandy SL; Pang JS; Ho MH; Matthews DB
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2013 Nov; 37(11):1963-70. PubMed ID: 23888884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do college students drink more than they think? Use of a free-pour paradigm to determine how college students define standard drinks.
    White AM; Kraus CL; McCracken LA; Swartzwelder HS
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1750-6. PubMed ID: 14634490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. College students lack knowledge of standard drink volumes: implications for definitions of risky drinking based on survey data.
    White AM; Kraus CL; Flom JD; Kestenbaum LA; Mitchell JR; Shah K; Swartzwelder HS
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2005 Apr; 29(4):631-8. PubMed ID: 15834229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pour Guess: The Effect of Glass Shape and an Ice Substitute on Alcohol Pouring and Estimation.
    Knibb G; Jones A; Christiansen P
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2018 Jul; 42(7):1228-1236. PubMed ID: 29708597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical evaluation of the presence of a label containing standard drinks on pour accuracy among US college students.
    Brunk E; Becker MW; Bix L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241583. PubMed ID: 33151959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personalized feedback based on a drink-pouring exercise may improve knowledge of, and adherence to, government guidelines for alcohol consumption.
    de Visser RO
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2015 Feb; 39(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 25684051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alcohol pouring practices among 65- to 74-year-olds in Western Australia.
    Wilkinson C; Allsop S; Chikritzhs T
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2011 Mar; 30(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 21355907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pour Convergence: College Students' Definitions and Free-Poured Volumes of Standard Alcohol Servings.
    Kohn CS; Schultz NR; Bettencourt K; Dunn Carlton H
    J Drug Educ; 2017; 47(1-2):36-50. PubMed ID: 29231063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of the free-pour assessment: Implications for research, assessment and intervention.
    Schultz NR; Kohn CS; Schmerbauch M; Correia CJ
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2017 Jun; 25(3):125-140. PubMed ID: 28287794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shape of glass and amount of alcohol poured: comparative study of effect of practice and concentration.
    Wansink B; van Ittersum K
    BMJ; 2005 Dec; 331(7531):1512-4. PubMed ID: 16373735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Habit predicts in-the-moment alcohol consumption.
    Albery IP; Collins I; Moss AC; Frings D; Spada MM
    Addict Behav; 2015 Feb; 41():78-80. PubMed ID: 25310826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Packing cannabis, pouring alcohol: Validating a free-pack assessment among college students using cannabis.
    Mian MN; Altman BR; Morrissey C; Ueno LF; Dalal D; Earleywine M
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2021 Dec; 35(8):877-886. PubMed ID: 33793281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Actual and perceived units of alcohol in a self-defined "usual glass" of alcoholic drinks in England.
    Boniface S; Kneale J; Shelton N
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2013 Jun; 37(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 23278164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. My cup runneth over: young people's lack of knowledge of low-risk drinking guidelines.
    de Visser RO; Birch JD
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2012 Mar; 31(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 22050096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drinking Behavior, Taste Preferences and Special Beer Perception among Romanian University Students: A Qualitative Assessment Research.
    Jimborean MA; Salanță LC; Trusek A; Pop CR; Tofană M; Mudura E; Coldea TE; Farcaș A; Ilieș M; Pașca S; Uifălean A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33806851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Descriptors and accounts of alcohol consumption: methodological issues piloted with female undergraduate drinkers in Scotland.
    Gill JS; Donaghy M; Guise J; Warner P
    Health Educ Res; 2007 Feb; 22(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16740674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The behavioral economics of the bottomless cup: The effects of alcohol cup price on consumption in college students.
    Morrell MN; Reed DD; Martinetti MP
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2021 Feb; 29(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 32191070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual drinking patterns of college students: the relationship between typical companion status and consumption level.
    Harford TC; Wechsler H; Rohman M
    Curr Alcohol; 1981; 8():327-38. PubMed ID: 7343189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Celebrating St. Patrick's Day: Students' Expectations, Intent, and Behavior.
    Henslee AM; Irons JG; Bonn-Miller MO
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2016; 48(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 27014944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.