These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3405732)
1. Effects of visual and auditory noise on visual choice reaction time in a continuous-flow paradigm. Stoffels EJ; van der Molen MW Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jul; 44(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 3405732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemispheric differences on sequential effects in a choice reaction task. Possamaï CA Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 7329523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid learning of visual and auditory spatial task in binocularly deprived cats. Rodriguez C; Zernicki B Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1982; 42(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 7180588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of any auditory stimulus on the processing of a visual stimulus single- and dual-tasks conditions. Simon JR Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Aug; 51(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 7136846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Expectancy and frequency effects on perceptual and motor systems in choice reaction time. Miller J; Anbar R Mem Cognit; 1981 Nov; 9(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 7329244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Attending to simple auditory and visual signals. Mulligan RM; Shaw ML Percept Psychophys; 1981 Nov; 30(5):447-54. PubMed ID: 7329761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Miller J Cogn Psychol; 1982 Apr; 14(2):247-79. PubMed ID: 7083803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultradian cyclicity in auditory and visual reaction time during long performance. Almirall H; Ferrer R; Sànchez-Turet M Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 3399336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention to auditory and peripheral visual stimuli: effects of arousal and predictability. Johnson TL; Shapiro KL Acta Psychol (Amst); 1989 Dec; 72(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 2618791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Van Duren LL; Sanders AF Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 3245478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Nicoletti R; Umiltà C; Tressoldi EP; Marzi CA Percept Psychophys; 1988 Mar; 43(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3347489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dependence of target redundancy effects on noise conditions and number of targets. Grice GR; Gwynne JW Percept Psychophys; 1987 Jul; 42(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 3658635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of early event-related potentials in two target detection tasks. McCallum WC; Curry SH Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 425():242-9. PubMed ID: 6588839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) determined temporal modulation of visual and auditory sensory processing in the context of classical conditioning to faces. Dolan RJ; Heinze HJ; Hurlemann R; Hinrichs H Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):778-89. PubMed ID: 16784875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of auditory stimulation on a visual oblique effect. Johnstone S; Wenderoth P Perception; 1987; 16(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 3684478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays. Umiltá C; Frost N; Hyman R J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention. Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Choice reaction-time study assessing the verbal behavior of the minor hemisphere in normal adult humans. Moscovitch M J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1972 Jul; 80(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 5044264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]