153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3405742)
1. A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth.
Brown JM; Weisstein N
Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 3405742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional perception of planar line segments.
Hoyer HW
Perception; 1979; 8(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 503768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A stereo illusion induced by binocularly presented gratings: effects of number of eyes stimulated, spatial frequency, orientation, field size, and viewing distance.
Odom JV; Chao GM
Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 3627934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Flicker induces depth: spatial and temporal factors in the perceptual segregation of flickering and nonflickering regions in depth.
Wong E; Weisstein N
Percept Psychophys; 1984 Mar; 35(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 6728621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Depth inversion in random-dot stereograms.
Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
Perception; 1979; 8(4):397-9. PubMed ID: 503770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The local character of perspective organization.
von Grünau MW; Wiggin S; Reed M
Percept Psychophys; 1984 Apr; 35(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 6739266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparity-processing in Wilde's dot-row phenomenon.
van der Meer HC
Psychol Res; 1982; 44(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 7146237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Depth separation and the Ponzo illusion.
Patterson R; Fox R
Percept Psychophys; 1983 Jul; 34(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 6634355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An application of the gradient space representation.
Clement RA
Percept Psychophys; 1986 Mar; 39(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 3737348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the components of disparity in Wilde's dot-row phenomenon.
van der Meer HC
Psychol Res; 1982; 44(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 7146239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Wilde's dot-row phenomenon as a special case of aniseikonia.
van der Meer HC
Psychol Res; 1982; 44(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 7146238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pseudoscopic viewing: transfer and persistence of reversed depth relations from the viewing of photographs to the real scene.
Kalaugher PG
Perception; 1987; 16(3):359-74. PubMed ID: 3432031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: an empirical and theoretical study.
Gillam B; Chambers D; Lawergren B
Percept Psychophys; 1988 Nov; 44(5):473-83. PubMed ID: 3226898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Depth interpolation with sparse disparity cues.
Würger SM; Landy MS
Perception; 1989; 18(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 2771593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absence of depth processing in the large-frame rod-and-frame effect.
Ebenholtz SM; Glaser GW
Percept Psychophys; 1982 Aug; 32(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 7145583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Necker cube reversal reduced by two dimensional spatial perceptual cue.
Radilová J; Radil T
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1983; 43(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6880872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects.
Kaneko H; Uchikawa K
Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The paradoxical moon illusions.
Gilinsky AS
Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):271-83. PubMed ID: 7367178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The perspective illusion: perceived size and distance in fields varying in suggested depth, in children and adults.
WOHLWILL JF
J Exp Psychol; 1962 Sep; 64():300-10. PubMed ID: 14007857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent reversals as a function of perceiver group, distance, and geometric shape.
Oreel TN; Munz DC
Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):417-8. PubMed ID: 724380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
