These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3405746)

  • 21. Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.
    van der Schoot M; Licht R; Horsley TM; Sergeant JA
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16014077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what?
    Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device.
    Akamatsu M; MacKenzie IS; Hasbroucq T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 7729406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When audiovisual correspondence disturbs visual processing.
    Hong SW; Shim WM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1325-32. PubMed ID: 26884130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Reaction time and temporal serial judgment: corroboration or dissociation?].
    Neumann O; Koch R; Niepel M; Tappe T
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):621-45. PubMed ID: 1295274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emission amplitudes change with changes of directed attention.
    Froehlich P; Collet L; Morgon A
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Apr; 53(4):679-82. PubMed ID: 8511172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory and visual reaction time in adults during long performance.
    Almirall H; Gutiérrez E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Oct; 65(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 3696924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modality, difficulty, and "coupling" in vigilance behavior.
    Loeb M; Binford JR
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 5142063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Functional anatomy of arousal and attention systems in the human brain.
    Paus T
    Prog Brain Res; 2000; 126():65-77. PubMed ID: 11105640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relation between physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time.
    Sanders AF; Wertheim AH
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 4515817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 'Time-shrinking perception' in the visual system: a psychophysical and high-density ERP study.
    Nagaike A; Mitsudo T; Nakajima Y; Ogata K; Yamasaki T; Goto Y; Tobimatsu S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3279-3290. PubMed ID: 27401472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of shock-induced anxiety on noise in the visual system.
    Nettelbeck T
    Perception; 1972; 1(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 4680932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Monitoring performance across sense modes: an individual differences approach.
    Tyler DM; Waag WL; Halcomb CG
    Hum Factors; 1972 Dec; 14(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 4661179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Brief Period of Postnatal Visual Deprivation Alters the Balance between Auditory and Visual Attention.
    de Heering A; Dormal G; Pelland M; Lewis T; Maurer D; Collignon O
    Curr Biol; 2016 Nov; 26(22):3101-3105. PubMed ID: 27839972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methodological considerations for the study of multimodal signal detection.
    Stanislaw H
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Dec; 44(6):541-50. PubMed ID: 3059316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two stages in crossmodal saccadic integration: evidence from a visual-auditory focused attention task.
    Arndt PA; Colonius H
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 150(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 12728291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novelty, recency and frequency effects on visual recognition and pseudo-recognition thresholds.
    Pyke SW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):847-56. PubMed ID: 5040499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Infants' visual preferences in the presence and absence of auditory stimulation.
    Moore DS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Feb; 59(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 7876769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation.
    Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 18207117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.