144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34057537)
1. [Voice diagnostics in phonosurgical interventions].
Schneider-Stickler B
HNO; 2021 Sep; 69(9):705-711. PubMed ID: 34057537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Psychogenic mutation of the voice. Comparative analysis of objective and subjective methods of diagnostics].
Chernobel'skiĭ SI
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2011; (4):46-8. PubMed ID: 21983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing efficacy of voice treatments: a guideline.
Dejonckere PH;
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 11387654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function.
Patel RR; Awan SN; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Courey M; Deliyski D; Eadie T; Paul D; Švec JG; Hillman R
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Aug; 27(3):887-905. PubMed ID: 29955816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Study on self-assessment, acoustic analysis, laryngoscopy for patients with voice surgery].
Yu Z; Pang Z
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Nov; 24(21):980-2, 986. PubMed ID: 21261018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS).
Dejonckere PH; Bradley P; Clemente P; Cornut G; Crevier-Buchman L; Friedrich G; Van De Heyning P; Remacle M; Woisard V;
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Feb; 258(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 11307610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations in Female Teachers With Functionally Healthy Voice.
Phadke KV; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Kankare E; Geneid A; Švec JG
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):485.e33-485.e43. PubMed ID: 30342798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of three-dimensional laryngostroboscopy for office-based laryngeal diagnostics and phonosurgical therapy.
Caffier PP; Nawka T; Ibrahim-Nasr A; Thomas B; Müller H; Ko SR; Song W; Gross M; Weikert S
Laryngoscope; 2018 Dec; 128(12):2823-2831. PubMed ID: 30328614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of Phonosurgery, Logopedic Voice Treatment and Vocal Pedagogy in Common Voice Problems of Singers.
Ropero Rendón MDM; Ermakova T; Freymann ML; Ruschin A; Nawka T; Caffier PP
Adv Ther; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1069-1086. PubMed ID: 29949040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized acoustic voice analysis and subjective scaled evaluation of the voice can avoid the need for laryngoscopy after thyroid surgery.
Ortega J; Cassinello N; Dorcaratto D; Leopaldi E
Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19231578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Voice Quality in Patients With Vocal Fold Polyps: The Size of a Polyp Matters or Does it?
Öcal B; Tatar EÇ; Toptaş G; Barmak E; Saylam G; Korkmaz MH
J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 31060763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voice assessment: updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods.
Mehta DD; Hillman RE
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 16(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 18475073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of subjective assessment of voice disorders and objective voice measurement.
Hanschmann H; Lohmann A; Berger R
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 20938187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating iPhone recordings for acoustic voice assessment.
Lin E; Hornibrook J; Ormond T
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(3):122-30. PubMed ID: 22584162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Voice problems after pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: videolaryngostroboscopic, acoustic, and perceptual assessment.
Smith ME; Marsh JH; Cotton RT; Myer CM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1993 Jan; 25(1-3):173-81. PubMed ID: 8436462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The correlation between subjective and objective voice evaluation in organic and functional larynx disorders].
Wiskirska-Woźnica B; Pruszewicz A; Obrebowski A; Swidziński P
Otolaryngol Pol; 2003; 57(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 14587393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impairment of voice quality in paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction.
Yelken K; Gultekin E; Guven M; Eyibilen A; Aladag I
J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):724-7. PubMed ID: 20097526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech: Is it a reliable tool?
Suhail IS; Kazi RA; Jagade M
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 27146761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A method of data collection in the acoustic evaluation of the effect of phonosurgical operations on the larynx].
Zalesska-Krecicka M; Kamiński J
Otolaryngol Pol; 1988; 42(5):356-64. PubMed ID: 3253649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An Examination of Pre- and Posttreatment Acoustic Versus Auditory Perceptual Analyses of Voice Across Four Common Voice Disorders.
Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J; Lewandowski A; Awan SN
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 28688672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
