227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34058719)
21. A Monte-Carlo-based and GPU-accelerated 4D-dose calculator for a pencil beam scanning proton therapy system.
Pepin MD; Tryggestad E; Wan Chan Tseung HS; Johnson JE; Herman MG; Beltran C
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5293-5304. PubMed ID: 30203550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development and validation of MonteRay, a fast Monte Carlo dose engine for carbon ion beam radiotherapy.
Lysakovski P; Kopp B; Tessonnier T; Mein S; Ferrari A; Haberer T; Debus J; Mairani A
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1433-1449. PubMed ID: 37748042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modelling small block aperture in an in-house developed GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo-based dose engine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Feng H; Holmes JM; Vora SA; Stoker JB; Bues M; Wong WW; Sio TS; Foote RL; Patel SH; Shen J; Liu W
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jan; 69(3):. PubMed ID: 37944480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical examination of proton pencil beam scanning on a moving anthropomorphic lung phantom.
Wang P; Tang S; Taylor PA; Cummings DE; Janson M; Traneus E; Sturgeon JD; Lee AK; Chang C
Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29759487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Millisecond speed deep learning based proton dose calculation with Monte Carlo accuracy.
Pastor-Serrano O; Perkó Z
Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(10):. PubMed ID: 35447605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Deng W; Younkin JE; Souris K; Huang S; Augustine K; Fatyga M; Ding X; Cohilis M; Bues M; Shan J; Stoker J; Lin L; Shen J; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2558-2574. PubMed ID: 32153029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose calculation accuracy in particle therapy: Comparing carbon ions with protons.
Ruangchan S; Palmans H; Knäusl B; Georg D; Clausen M
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7333-7345. PubMed ID: 34482555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?
Teoh S; Fiorini F; George B; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190583. PubMed ID: 31696729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Chen M; Yepes P; Hojo Y; Poenisch F; Li Y; Chen J; Xu C; He X; Gunn GB; Frank SJ; Sahoo N; Li H; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190669. PubMed ID: 31799859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dosimetric validation of Monte Carlo and analytical dose engines with raster-scanning
Mein S; Kopp B; Tessonnier T; Ackermann B; Ecker S; Bauer J; Choi K; Aricò G; Ferrari A; Haberer T; Debus J; Abdollahi A; Mairani A
Phys Med; 2019 Aug; 64():123-131. PubMed ID: 31515011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A fast GPU-based Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport with detailed modeling of nonelastic interactions.
Wan Chan Tseung H; Ma J; Beltran C
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2967-78. PubMed ID: 26127050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer.
Tommasino F; Fellin F; Lorentini S; Farace P
Phys Med; 2018 Jun; 50():7-12. PubMed ID: 29891097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
