These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34060080)

  • 1. How Good Is Your Model Fit? Weighted Goodness-of-Fit Metrics for Irregular Time Series.
    Collenteur RA
    Ground Water; 2021 Jul; 59(4):474-478. PubMed ID: 34060080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on "How Good is Your Model Fit? Weighted Goodness-of-Fit Metrics for Irregular Time Series".
    Zaadnoordijk WJ
    Ground Water; 2022 Mar; 60(2):162-164. PubMed ID: 35088899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply to Comment on "How Good is Your Model Fit? Weighted Goodness-of-Fit Metrics for Irregular Time Series".
    Collenteur RA
    Ground Water; 2022 Mar; 60(2):165-166. PubMed ID: 35060123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulation of the goodness of fit in hydrological modelling based on inner balance errors.
    Pellicer-Martínez F; Gomariz-Castillo F; Portela MM; Martínez-Alcalá IM; Martínez-Paz JM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260117. PubMed ID: 34793576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Goodness-of-fit test for monotone proportional subdistribution hazards assumptions based on weighted residuals.
    Boher JM; Filleron T; Giorgi R; Kramar A; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):362-377. PubMed ID: 27790725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sum of standardized residuals: Goodness-of-fit test for binary response models.
    Chen L; Sui Y; Song C; Rempala GA
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1932-1941. PubMed ID: 29579778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrete time rescaling theorem: determining goodness of fit for discrete time statistical models of neural spiking.
    Haslinger R; Pipa G; Brown E
    Neural Comput; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2477-506. PubMed ID: 20608868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weighted cumulative sum tests for random effect models with binary responses.
    Korre AK; Vasdekis VG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2167-2178. PubMed ID: 31718452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A common goodness-of-fit framework for neural population models using marked point process time-rescaling.
    Tao L; Weber KE; Arai K; Eden UT
    J Comput Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 45(2):147-162. PubMed ID: 30298220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
    Nattino G; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 32134502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Goodness-of-fit measures for individual-level models of infectious disease in a Bayesian framework.
    Gardner A; Deardon R; Darlington G
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 2(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 22748225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the goodness of fit in models of sparse medical data: a simulation approach.
    Boyle P; Flowerdew R; Williams A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 9222792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for autoregressive logistic regression models with applications to patient screening.
    Hansen AM; Jeske D; Kirsch W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 24854578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A class of goodness-of-fit test for the additive hazards model with case-cohort data.
    Cao Y; Yu J
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):451-461. PubMed ID: 33305424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing goodness of fit of parametric models for censored data.
    Nysen R; Aerts M; Faes C
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(21):2374-85. PubMed ID: 22714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):720-9. PubMed ID: 9629652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goodness-of-fit tests for correlated paired binary data.
    Tang ML; Pei YB; Wong WK; Li JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Aug; 21(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 20810456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Goodness of fit tests for estimating equations based on pseudo-observations.
    Pavlič K; Martinussen T; Andersen PK
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):189-205. PubMed ID: 29488163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A goodness-of-fit test for the proportional odds regression model.
    Fagerland MW; Hosmer DW
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(13):2235-49. PubMed ID: 23037691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.