BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34060548)

  • 1. Feature fusion of Raman chemical imaging and digital histopathology using machine learning for prostate cancer detection.
    Doherty T; McKeever S; Al-Attar N; Murphy T; Aura C; Rahman A; O'Neill A; Finn SP; Kay E; Gallagher WM; Watson RWG; Gowen A; Jackman P
    Analyst; 2021 Jun; 146(13):4195-4211. PubMed ID: 34060548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional reduction based on peak fitting of Raman micro spectroscopy data improves detection of prostate cancer in tissue specimens.
    Plante A; Dallaire F; Grosset AA; Nguyen T; Birlea M; Wong J; Daoust F; Roy N; Kougioumoutzakis A; Azzi F; Aubertin K; Kadoury S; Latour M; Albadine R; Prendeville S; Boutros P; Fraser M; Bristow RG; van der Kwast T; Orain M; Brisson H; Benzerdjeb N; Hovington H; Bergeron A; Fradet Y; Têtu B; Saad F; Trudel D; Leblond F
    J Biomed Opt; 2021 Nov; 26(11):. PubMed ID: 34743445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics.
    Wildeboer RR; Mannaerts CK; van Sloun RJG; Budäus L; Tilki D; Wijkstra H; Salomon G; Mischi M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):806-815. PubMed ID: 31602512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning.
    Nguyen TH; Sridharan S; Macias V; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Melamed J; Do MN; Popescu G
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Mar; 22(3):36015. PubMed ID: 28358941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer.
    Abdollahi H; Mofid B; Shiri I; Razzaghdoust A; Saadipoor A; Mahdavi A; Galandooz HM; Mahdavi SR
    Radiol Med; 2019 Jun; 124(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 30607868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiparametric MRI and auto-fixed volume of interest-based radiomics signature for clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Bleker J; Kwee TC; Dierckx RAJO; de Jong IJ; Huisman H; Yakar D
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1313-1324. PubMed ID: 31776744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts.
    Nir G; Hor S; Karimi D; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Wilson RS; Iczkowski KA; Lucia MS; Black PC; Abolmaesumi P; Goldenberg SL; Salcudean SE
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Dec; 50():167-180. PubMed ID: 30340027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Raman spectroscopy and topological machine learning for cancer grading.
    Conti F; D'Acunto M; Caudai C; Colantonio S; Gaeta R; Moroni D; Pascali MA
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7282. PubMed ID: 37142690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional validation of metabolic genes that distinguish Gleason 3 from Gleason 4 prostate cancer foci.
    Roberto D; Selvarajah S; Park PC; Berman D; Venkateswaran V
    Prostate; 2019 Nov; 79(15):1777-1788. PubMed ID: 31503357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mesoscopic characterization of prostate cancer using Raman spectroscopy: potential for diagnostics and therapeutics.
    Aubertin K; Trinh VQ; Jermyn M; Baksic P; Grosset AA; Desroches J; St-Arnaud K; Birlea M; Vladoiu MC; Latour M; Albadine R; Saad F; Leblond F; Trudel D
    BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):326-336. PubMed ID: 29542855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histologic tissue components provide major cues for machine learning-based prostate cancer detection and grading on prostatectomy specimens.
    Han W; Johnson C; Gaed M; Gómez JA; Moussa M; Chin JL; Pautler S; Bauman GS; Ward AD
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9911. PubMed ID: 32555410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High spatiotemporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI improves the image-based discrimination of histopathology risk groups of peripheral zone prostate cancer: a supervised machine learning approach.
    Winkel DJ; Breit HC; Block TK; Boll DT; Heye TJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4828-4837. PubMed ID: 32328763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-clinical evaluation of an image-guided in-situ Raman spectroscopy navigation system for targeted prostate cancer interventions.
    Shams R; Picot F; Grajales D; Sheehy G; Dallaire F; Birlea M; Saad F; Trudel D; Menard C; Leblond F; Kadoury S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 May; 15(5):867-876. PubMed ID: 32227280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.