BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34061361)

  • 1. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 1:1 matched analysis.
    Goh BKP; Syn N; Koh YX; Teo JY; Cheow PC; Jeyaraj PR; Chow PKH; Ooi LLPJ; Chung AYF; Chan CY
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):560-571. PubMed ID: 34061361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early Morbidity and Mortality after Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Propensity-Score Matched Comparison with Open Resection.
    Xourafas D; Pawlik TM; Cloyd JM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Jul; 23(7):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 30377911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis of 224 patients.
    Wong KC; Lee KF; Lo EYJ; Fung AKY; Lok HT; Cheung SYS; Ng KKC; Wong J; Lai PBS; Chong CCN
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Mar; 408(1):118. PubMed ID: 36917309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive versus open right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy for central liver malignancies: a propensity-score-matched analysis.
    Chin KM; Linn YL; Cheong CK; Koh YX; Teo JY; Chung AYF; Chan CY; Goh BKP
    ANZ J Surg; 2021 Apr; 91(4):E174-E182. PubMed ID: 33719128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minor laparoscopic liver resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma is safer than minor open resection, especially for less compensated cirrhotic patients: Propensity score analysis.
    Di Sandro S; Bagnardi V; Najjar M; Buscemi V; Lauterio A; De Carlis R; Danieli M; Pinotti E; Benuzzi L; De Carlis L
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):722-729. PubMed ID: 30449499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.
    Takahara T; Wakabayashi G; Beppu T; Aihara A; Hasegawa K; Gotohda N; Hatano E; Tanahashi Y; Mizuguchi T; Kamiyama T; Ikeda T; Tanaka S; Taniai N; Baba H; Tanabe M; Kokudo N; Konishi M; Uemoto S; Sugioka A; Hirata K; Taketomi A; Maehara Y; Kubo S; Uchida E; Miyata H; Nakamura M; Kaneko H; Yamaue H; Miyazaki M; Takada T
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Oct; 22(10):721-7. PubMed ID: 26096910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissemination of Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Primary Malignancy: Reevaluating Effectiveness.
    Varley PR; Tohme ST; Chidi AP; Goswami J; van der Windt D; Geller DA; Tsung A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):808-817. PubMed ID: 29302818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.
    Lee DH; Kim D; Park YH; Yoon J; Kim JS
    Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):206-212. PubMed ID: 32532684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term perioperative outcomes of pure laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.
    Yoon YI; Kim KH; Cho HD; Kwon JH; Jung DH; Park GC; Song GW; Ha TY; Lee SG
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):796-805. PubMed ID: 31161292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection criteria for minimally invasive resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-a word of caution: a propensity score matched analysis using the national cancer database.
    Salehi O; Kazakova V; Vega EA; Kutlu OC; Alarcon SV; Freeman R; Kozyreva O; Conrad C
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):5382-5391. PubMed ID: 34750709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimal-invasive versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of postoperative outcomes and long-term survivals using propensity score matching analysis.
    Andreou A; Struecker B; Raschzok N; Krenzien F; Haber P; Wabitsch S; Waldbaur C; Touet EM; Eichelberg AC; Atanasov G; Biebl M; Bahra M; Öllinger R; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):751-758. PubMed ID: 30449503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome.
    Berardi G; Ivanics T; Sapisochin G; Ratti F; Sposito C; Nebbia M; D'Souza DM; Pascual F; Tohme S; D'Amico FE; Alessandris R; Panetta V; Simonelli I; Del Basso C; Russolillo N; Fiorentini G; Serenari M; Rotellar F; Zimitti G; Famularo S; Hoffman D; Onkendi E; Lopez-Ben S; Caula C; Rompianesi G; Chopra A; Abu Hilal M; Torzilli G; Corvera C; Alseidi A; Helton S; Troisi RI; Simo K; Conrad C; Cescon M; Cleary S; Kwon CHD; Ferrero A; Ettorre GM; Cillo U; Geller D; Cherqui D; Serrano PE; Ferrone C; Mazzaferro V; Aldrighetti L; Kingham TP
    Ann Surg; 2023 Nov; 278(5):e1041-e1047. PubMed ID: 36994755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between minimally invasive liver resection and open liver resection: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Wei D; Johnston S; Patkar A; Buell JF
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 May; 23(5):785-794. PubMed ID: 33046367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Patients with Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas Meeting the Milan Criteria: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Peng Y; Liu F; Xu H; Lan X; Wei Y; Li B
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 31411541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive versus Open Liver Resection for Stage I/II Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Birgin E; Kaslow SR; Hetjens S; Correa-Gallego C; Rahbari NN
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Sep; 13(19):. PubMed ID: 34638285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: What Are the Advantages in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Personal Experience.
    Coletta D; De Padua C; Parrino C; De Peppo V; Oddi A; Frigieri C; Grazi GL
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Oct; 30(10):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 32707003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of major laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Guro H; Cho JY; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Kim S; Kim K; Hyun IG
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 29549901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Versus Open Minor Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: A Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Nota CL; Woo Y; Raoof M; Boerner T; Molenaar IQ; Choi GH; Kingham TP; Latorre K; Borel Rinkes IHM; Hagendoorn J; Fong Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):583-590. PubMed ID: 30334196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatic Resection for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Less Than 5 cm in Cirrhotic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    El-Gendi A; El-Shafei M; El-Gendi S; Shawky A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Mar; 28(3):302-310. PubMed ID: 29172949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis with conventional open liver resection.
    Han DH; Choi SH; Park EJ; Kang DR; Choi GH; Choi JS
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):735-742. PubMed ID: 26537176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.