BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34061430)

  • 1. More than cost-effectiveness? Applying a second-stage filter to improve policy decision making.
    Kan K; Jörg F; Lokkerbol J; Mihalopoulos C; Buskens E; Schoevers RA; Feenstra TL
    Health Expect; 2021 Aug; 24(4):1413-1423. PubMed ID: 34061430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing cost-effectiveness in mental health: helping policy-makers prioritize and plan health services.
    Vos T; Haby MM; Magnus A; Mihalopoulos C; Andrews G; Carter R
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2005 Aug; 39(8):701-12. PubMed ID: 16050924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.
    Uzochukwu BSC; Okeke C; O'Brien N; Ruiz F; Sombie I; Hollingworth S
    Global Health; 2020 Jul; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 32641066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priority-setting for obesity prevention-The Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of obesity prevention policies in Australia (ACE-Obesity Policy) study.
    Ananthapavan J; Sacks G; Brown V; Moodie M; Nguyen P; Veerman L; Mantilla Herrera AM; Lal A; Peeters A; Carter R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234804. PubMed ID: 32559212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework: an overview of systematic reviews of decision criteria for health decision-making.
    Stratil JM; Baltussen R; Scheel I; Nacken A; Rehfuess EA
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2020; 18():8. PubMed ID: 32071560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Key stakeholders' perceptions of the acceptability and usefulness of a tablet-based tool to improve communication and shared decision making in ICUs.
    Ernecoff NC; Witteman HO; Chon K; Chen YI; Buddadhumaruk P; Chiarchiaro J; Shotsberger KJ; Shields AM; Myers BA; Hough CL; Carson SS; Lo B; Matthay MA; Anderson WG; Peterson MW; Steingrub JS; Arnold RM; White DB
    J Crit Care; 2016 Jun; 33():19-25. PubMed ID: 27037049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.
    Williams I; McIver S; Moore D; Bryan S
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 Apr; 12(7):iii, ix-x, 1-175. PubMed ID: 18373906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.
    Vokó Z; Cheung KL; Józwiak-Hagymásy J; Wolfenstetter S; Jones T; Muñoz C; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M; de Vries H; Pokhrel S;
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 May; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 27230485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
    Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups.
    Hodgetts K; Hiller JE; Street JM; Carter D; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Watt AM; Moss JR; Elshaug AG;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 May; 14():204. PubMed ID: 24885716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity (ACE-obesity): an overview of the ACE approach, economic methods and cost results.
    Carter R; Moodie M; Markwick A; Magnus A; Vos T; Swinburn B; Haby MM
    BMC Public Health; 2009 Nov; 9():419. PubMed ID: 19922625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
    Aidem JM
    Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research funding impact and priority setting - advancing universal access and quality healthcare research in Malaysia.
    Fun WH; Sararaks S; Tan EH; Tang KF; Chong DWQ; Low LL; Sapian RA; Ismail SA; Govind SK; Mahmud SH; Murad S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 19(1):248. PubMed ID: 31018843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental health care system optimization from a health-economics perspective: where to sow and where to reap?
    Lokkerbol J; Weehuizen R; Mavranezouli I; Mihalopoulos C; Smit F
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 25153093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Cost-Effectiveness--Mental Health: introduction to the study and methods.
    Haby MM; Carter R; Mihalopoulos C; Magnus A; Sanderson K; Andrews G; Vos T
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2004 Aug; 38(8):569-78. PubMed ID: 15298579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.
    Winkley K; Upsher R; Stahl D; Pollard D; Kasera A; Brennan A; Heller S; Ismail K
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jun; 24(28):1-232. PubMed ID: 32568666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.