146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34062336)
1. The effect of tube focal spot size and acquisition mode on task-based image quality performance of a GE revolution HD dual energy CT scanner.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Phys Med; 2021 Jun; 86():75-81. PubMed ID: 34062336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic task-based image quality assessment of photon-counting and energy integrating CT as a function of reconstruction kernel and phantom size.
Bhattarai M; Bache S; Abadi E; Samei E
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 37469179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of synthesized normal-resolution image data generated from high-resolution acquisitions on a commercial CT scanner.
Hernandez AM; Shin DW; Abbey CK; Seibert JA; Akino N; Goto T; Vaishnav JY; Boedeker KL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4775-4785. PubMed ID: 32677085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical Note: Quality assessment of virtual monochromatic spectral images on a dual energy CT scanner.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Phys Med; 2021 Feb; 82():114-121. PubMed ID: 33610006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image Quality Performance of Virtual Single-Source CT Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.
Alikhani B; Werner M; Jamali L; Wacker F; Werncke T
Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1095-1101. PubMed ID: 30482627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of four dual-energy CT platforms for abdominal imaging: a task-based image quality assessment based on phantom data.
Greffier J; Si-Mohamed S; Dabli D; de Forges H; Hamard A; Douek P; Beregi JP; Frandon J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5324-5334. PubMed ID: 33449188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size-specific optimization of CT protocols based on minimum detectability.
Zhang Y; Smitherman C; Samei E
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1301-1311. PubMed ID: 28122119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development, validation, and simplification of a scanner-specific CT simulator.
Tunissen SAM; Oostveen LJ; Moriakov N; Teuwen J; Michielsen K; Smit EJ; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2081-2095. PubMed ID: 37656009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective comparison of high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability for various clinical protocols on multiple CT scanners.
Racine D; Viry A; Becce F; Schmidt S; Ba A; Bochud FO; Edyvean S; Schegerer A; Verdun FR
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e153-e163. PubMed ID: 28901621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of focal spot blooming on high-contrast spatial resolution in CT imaging.
Grimes J; Duan X; Yu L; Halaweish AF; Haag N; Leng S; McCollough C
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6011-20. PubMed ID: 26429276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics.
Higaki T; Nakamura Y; Zhou J; Yu Z; Nemoto T; Tatsugami F; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 31818389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
Samei E; Richard S
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems.
Wilson JM; Christianson OI; Richard S; Samei E
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031908. PubMed ID: 23464323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Location and direction dependence in the 3D MTF for a high-resolution CT system.
Hernandez AM; Wu P; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2760-2771. PubMed ID: 33608927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
