These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34062383)
1. Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons. Devine K; Mojtahedi D Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101714. PubMed ID: 34062383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape? Parsons A; Mojtahedi D Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom. Allely CS; Cooper P J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):105-123. PubMed ID: 29978627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial. Lilley C; Willmott D; Mojtahedi D Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1086026. PubMed ID: 36727087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The "Casting Couch" Scenario: Impact of Perceived Employment Benefit, Reporting Delay, Complainant Gender, and Participant Gender on Juror Decision-Making in Rape Cases. Mcintosh S; Davis JP J Interpers Violence; 2022 May; 37(9-10):NP6676-NP6696. PubMed ID: 33084469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements. Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions. Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant. Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes. Osborn K; Davis JP; Button S; Foster J J Interpers Violence; 2021 Mar; 36(5-6):NP2675-NP2696. PubMed ID: 29629635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Juror Decision Making and Euthanasia: Exploring the Role of Jury Nullification, Manner of Death, and Defendant-Decedent Relationship. Scott JD; Bell D; Barry B; Edlund JE Psychol Rep; 2023 Dec; 126(6):3052-3070. PubMed ID: 35484479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial. Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status. Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus. Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force. Ewanation L; Maeder EM Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Failure of All Mothers or the Mother of All Failures? Juror Perceptions of Failure to Protect Laws. Stanziani M; Cox J J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):NP690-NP711. PubMed ID: 29294952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making. Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation. Ruva CL; Guenther CC Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases. Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]