These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34062383)

  • 21. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
    Curley LJ; Murray J; MacLean R; Laybourn P
    Med Sci Law; 2017 Oct; 57(4):211-219. PubMed ID: 28992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mock Juror Perceptions of Child Witnesses on the Autism Spectrum: The Impact of Providing Diagnostic Labels and Information About Autism.
    Crane L; Wilcock R; Maras KL; Chui W; Marti-Sanchez C; Henry LA
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2020 May; 50(5):1509-1519. PubMed ID: 30056502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
    Slane CR; Dodson CS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Racial bias in jury selection hurts mock jurors, not just defendants: Testing one potential intervention.
    Abramowitz K; Douglass AB
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):153-168. PubMed ID: 36931855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
    Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
    Margoni F; Brown TR
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: an examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms.
    Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Feb; 26(1):43-72. PubMed ID: 11868620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors' perceptions of rape trial testimony.
    Ryan N; Westera N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 31984046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists.
    Deitz SR; Blackwell KT; Daley PC; Bentley BJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1982 Aug; 43(2):372-84. PubMed ID: 7120042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
    Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
    Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
    Call AA; Wingrove T
    J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.
    Lynch KR; Wasarhaley NE; Golding JM; Simcic T
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Nov; 28(16):3205-22. PubMed ID: 23929601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
    Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.