These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34062636)

  • 21. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
    dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of Implant Inclination on Stress Distribution in Mandibular Overdentures.
    Ebadian B; Mosharraf R; Khodaeian N
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 23574403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
    Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Dayan SC; Geckili O
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Nov; 24(14):1606-1617. PubMed ID: 33798003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite element analysis of an implant-assisted removable partial denture during bilateral loading: occlusal rests position.
    Shahmiri R; Das R; Aarts JM; Bennani V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1126-33. PubMed ID: 24951387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structure and mechanical properties of Cresco-Ti laser-welded joints and stress analyses using finite element models of fixed distal extension and fixed partial prosthetic designs.
    Uysal H; Kurtoglu C; Gurbuz R; Tutuncu N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 15775924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Four-implant-supported fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdentures for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical and radiographic study.
    ElSyad MA; Alameldeen HE; Elsaih EA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1493–1503. PubMed ID: 31184639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Immediate versus conventional loading of implant-supported maxillary overdentures: a finite element stress analysis.
    Akca K; Eser A; Eckert S; Cavusoglu Y; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23527369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
    Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A 3D finite element analysis of glass fiber reinforcement designs on the stress of an implant-supported overdenture.
    Berger G; Pereira LFO; Souza EM; Rached RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):865.e1-865.e7. PubMed ID: 31010592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of horizontal misfit and bar framework material on the stress distribution of an overdenture-retaining bar system: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Spazzin AO; Dos Santos MB; Sobrinho LC; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 21973281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of porcelain veneer fracture in implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with a framework of either titanium, cobalt-chromium, or zirconia: An in vitro study.
    Vahnström M; Johansson PH; Svanborg P; Stenport VF
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Apr; 8(2):544-551. PubMed ID: 35313086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.