These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34065387)

  • 21. Are impact accelerations during treadmill running representative of those produced overground?
    Dillon S; Burke A; Whyte EF; O'Connor S; Gore S; Moran KA
    Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():195-202. PubMed ID: 36166957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity and Reliability of an Instrumented Treadmill with an Accelerometry System for Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Parameters and Impact Transmission.
    Encarnación-Martínez A; Pérez-Soriano P; Sanchis-Sanchis R; García-Gallart A; Berenguer-Vidal R
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Head and Tibial Acceleration as a Function of Stride Frequency and Visual Feedback during Running.
    Busa MA; Lim J; van Emmerik RE; Hamill J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157297. PubMed ID: 27271850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Crossover Studies Comparing Physiological, Perceptual and Performance Measures Between Treadmill and Overground Running.
    Miller JR; Van Hooren B; Bishop C; Buckley JD; Willy RW; Fuller JT
    Sports Med; 2019 May; 49(5):763-782. PubMed ID: 30847825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak Performance on a Motorized vs. a Nonmotorized Treadmill.
    Morgan AL; Laurent CM; Fullenkamp AM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jul; 30(7):1898-905. PubMed ID: 27328274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physiological responses during intermittent running exercise differ between outdoor and treadmill running.
    Panascì M; Lepers R; La Torre A; Bonato M; Assadi H
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2017 Sep; 42(9):973-977. PubMed ID: 28549220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of ventilation threshold and heart rate deflection point in fast and standard treadmill test protocols.
    Vucetić V; Sentija D; Sporis G; Trajković N; Milanović Z
    Acta Clin Croat; 2014 Jun; 53(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 25163235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Unmatched perception of speed when running overground and on a treadmill.
    Kong PW; Koh TM; Tan WC; Wang YS
    Gait Posture; 2012 May; 36(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 22357398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A description of shock attenuation for children running.
    Mercer JA; Dufek JS; Mangus BC; Rubley MD; Bhanot K; Aldridge JM
    J Athl Train; 2010; 45(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 20446839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-intensity re-warm-ups enhance soccer performance.
    Zois J; Bishop D; Fairweather I; Ball K; Aughey RJ
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Sep; 34(9):800-5. PubMed ID: 23444096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peak impact accelerations during track and treadmill running.
    Bigelow EM; Elvin NG; Elvin AA; Arnoczky SP
    J Appl Biomech; 2013 Oct; 29(5):639-44. PubMed ID: 23182887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of attachment methods of skin mounted inertial measurement units on tibial accelerations.
    Johnson CD; Outerleys J; Tenforde AS; Davis IS
    J Biomech; 2020 Dec; 113():110118. PubMed ID: 33197691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Running kinematics and shock absorption do not change after brief exhaustive running.
    Abt JP; Sell TC; Chu Y; Lovalekar M; Burdett RG; Lephart SM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1479-85. PubMed ID: 21386724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inspiratory Muscle Warm-up Improves 3,200-m Running Performance in Distance Runners.
    Barnes KR; Ludge AR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Jun; 35(6):1739-1747. PubMed ID: 30640308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the Best-designed Graded Exercise Test to Assess Peak Treadmill Speed.
    Peserico CS; Zagatto AM; Machado FA
    Int J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 36(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 25875318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Joint kinematics and kinetics of overground accelerated running versus running on an accelerated treadmill.
    Caekenberghe IV; Segers V; Aerts P; Willems P; De Clercq D
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Jul; 10(84):20130222. PubMed ID: 23676896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Running mechanics and leg muscle activity patterns during early and late acceleration phases of repeated treadmill sprints in male recreational athletes.
    Girard O; Brocherie F; Morin JB; Millet GP; Hansen C
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2020 Dec; 120(12):2785-2796. PubMed ID: 32980967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Better Economy on Indoor Track Compared to Treadmill Running With 1% Inclination.
    Pind R; Mooses K; Suvi S; Purge P; Viru M; Pehme A; Kaasik P; Mooses M
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Dec; 90(4):470-478. PubMed ID: 31282820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Comparison of Both Motorized and Nonmotorized Treadmill Gait Kinematics to Overground Locomotion.
    Fullenkamp AM; Tolusso DV; Laurent CM; Campbell BM; Cripps AE
    J Sport Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 27(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 28605231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shock attenuation, spatio-temporal and physiological parameter comparisons between land treadmill and water treadmill running.
    Macdermid PW; Fink PW; Stannard SR
    J Sport Health Sci; 2017 Dec; 6(4):482-488. PubMed ID: 30356623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.