These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34068639)

  • 21. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
    Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Plastics and sustainable purchase decisions in a circular economy: The case of Dutch food industry.
    Núñez-Cacho P; Leyva-Díaz JC; Sánchez-Molina J; Van der Gun R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239949. PubMed ID: 32986772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What are the key factors influencing consumers' preference and willingness to pay for meat products in Eastern DRC?
    Udomkun P; Ilukor J; Mockshell J; Mujawamariya G; Okafor C; Bullock R; Nabahungu NL; Vanlauwe B
    Food Sci Nutr; 2018 Nov; 6(8):2321-2336. PubMed ID: 30510732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consumers' perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes as indicators of safety and quality of chicken meat: Actionable information for public health authorities and the chicken industry.
    Katiyo W; Coorey R; Buys EM; de Kock HL
    J Food Sci; 2020 Jun; 85(6):1845-1855. PubMed ID: 32469089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Promotion strategies for environmentally friendly packaging: a stochastic differential game perspective.
    Wang C; Liu J; Fan R; Xiao L
    Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran); 2023; 20(7):7559-7568. PubMed ID: 36093339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cute as candy: a qualitative study of perceptions of snus branding and package design among youth in Norway.
    Scheffels J; Lund I
    BMJ Open; 2017 Apr; 7(4):e012837. PubMed ID: 28373248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of different chicken meat production systems on consumers' purchase perception.
    Pinto da Rosa P; Pio Ávila B; Damé Veber Angelo I; Garavaglia Chesini R; Albandes Fernandes T; da Silva Camacho J; Bugoni M; Roll VFB; Gularte MA
    Br Poult Sci; 2021 Jun; 62(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 33251830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Which product characteristics are preferred by Chinese consumers when choosing pork? A conjoint analysis on perceived quality of selected pork attributes.
    Ma XQ; Verkuil JM; Reinbach HC; Meinert L
    Food Sci Nutr; 2017 May; 5(3):770-775. PubMed ID: 28572967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nanotechnology: An Untapped Resource for Food Packaging.
    Sharma C; Dhiman R; Rokana N; Panwar H
    Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():1735. PubMed ID: 28955314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How consumers of plastic water bottles are responding to environmental policies?
    Orset C; Barret N; Lemaire A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():13-27. PubMed ID: 28117128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Co-Creation with Consumers for Packaging Design Validated through Implicit and Explicit Methods: Exploratory Effect of Visual and Textual Attributes.
    López-Mas L; Claret A; Bermúdez A; Llauger M; Guerrero L
    Foods; 2022 Apr; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35563908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationship between involvement and functional milk desserts intention to purchase. Influence on attitude towards packaging characteristics.
    Ares G; Besio M; Giménez A; Deliza R
    Appetite; 2010 Oct; 55(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 20609376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of Association between the Consumer Food Quality Perception and Acceptance of Enhanced Meat Products and Novel Packaging in a Population-Based Sample of Polish Consumers.
    Guzek D; Głąbska D; Sajdakowska M; Gutkowska K
    Foods; 2020 Oct; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 33114251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sustainable diet from the urban Brazilian consumer perspective.
    Barone B; Nogueira RM; Guimarães KRLSLQ; Behrens JH
    Food Res Int; 2019 Oct; 124():206-212. PubMed ID: 31466642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Swedish Consumers' Perception of Food Quality and Sustainability in Relation to Organic Food Production.
    Bosona T; Gebresenbet G
    Foods; 2018 Apr; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 29614785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transition to sustainable transport: understanding the antecedents of consumer's intention to adopt electric vehicles from the emotional research perspective.
    Xu G; Wang S; Zhao D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):20362-20374. PubMed ID: 33410073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Labeling strategies to overcome the problem of niche markets for sustainable milk products: The example of pasture-raised milk.
    Kühl S; Gassler B; Spiller A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jun; 100(6):5082-5096. PubMed ID: 28434723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review.
    Escursell S; Llorach-Massana P; Roncero MB
    J Clean Prod; 2021 Jan; 280():124314. PubMed ID: 32989345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Designing a Low-Fat Food Packaging: Comparing Consumers' Responses in Virtual and Physical Shopping Environments.
    Vila-López N; Kuster-Boluda I; Alacreu-Crespo A
    Foods; 2021 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33494169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sustainable and health claims vs sensory properties: Consumers' opinions and choices using a vegetable dip as example product.
    Mora M; Romeo-Arroyo E; Torán-Pereg P; Chaya C; Vázquez-Araújo L
    Food Res Int; 2020 Nov; 137():109521. PubMed ID: 33233154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.