These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34070253)

  • 1. Comparison of Fissure Sealant Chair Time and Patients' Preference Using Three Different Isolation Techniques.
    Mattar RE; Sulimany AM; Binsaleh SS; Al-Majed IM
    Children (Basel); 2021 May; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 34070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of fissure sealant retention rates using Isolite in comparison with rubber dam and cotton roll isolation techniques: A randomized clinical trial.
    Mattar RE; Sulimany AM; Binsaleh SS; Hamdan HM; Al-Majed IM
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2023 Jan; 33(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 35543302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isolite vs cotton roll isolation in the placement of dental sealants.
    Lyman T; Viswanathan K; McWhorter A
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(3):E95-9. PubMed ID: 23756302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A literature review of clinical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and future preference of Isolite and DryShield dental isolation systems among pediatric patients.
    Bagher SM; Sabbagh HJ
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Jul; 47(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 37408340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency and patient satisfaction with the Isolite system versus rubber dam for sealant placement in pediatric patients.
    Alhareky MS; Mermelstein D; Finkelman M; Alhumaid J; Loo C
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(5):400-4. PubMed ID: 25303507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of the Isolite system during sealant placement: efficacy and patient acceptance.
    Collette J; Wilson S; Sullivan D
    Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 20483019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention and effectiveness of fissure sealants in Kuwaiti school children.
    Francis R; Mascarenhas AK; Soparkar P; Al-Mutawaa S
    Community Dent Health; 2008 Dec; 25(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 19149297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Rubber Dam Association With Physiological Stress Parameters on Children of 7-10 Years Undergoing Pit and Fissure Sealant Treatment: An In-Vivo Study.
    Sharma D; Choudhari S; Vanza H; Mittal S; Ahuja V; Thosar NR
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58615. PubMed ID: 38770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of child's behavior during the pit and fissure sealant administration using the rubber dam and MiniDam: A randomized clinical trial.
    Rahul S; Saikiran KV; Elicherla NR; Anchala K; Singaraju A; Nuvvula S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2024 Apr; 42(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 38957909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pit and fissure sealants: results at five and ten years.
    Albani F; Ballesio I; Campanella V; Marzo G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jun; 6(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 16004533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An
    Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Forss H; Walsh T; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Mäkelä M; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 23543512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year Sealant Retention and Efficacy in a Multi-operated School-based Oral Health Programme in Kuwait.
    Francis R; Ariga J; Al Mutawa S; Soparkar P; Mascarenhas AK
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2016; 14(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 26870848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealant bonded using sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation adhesives: An
    Nirwan M; Nigam AG; Marwah N; Nayak UA; Bansal A; Gahlot MS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(4):359-366. PubMed ID: 28914250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One year clinical evaluation of the retention and quality of two fluoride releasing sealants.
    Ganss C; Klimek J; Gleim A
    Clin Oral Investig; 1999 Dec; 3(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 10803133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of fissure sealants retention following four different isolation and surface preparation techniques: four years clinical trial.
    Lygidakis NA; Oulis KI; Christodoulidis A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 19(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 7865418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop.
    Feigal RJ; Quelhas I
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 14579879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of sealants applied to first permanent molars in a dental school setting.
    Gale TJ; Hanes CM; Myers DR; Russell CM
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 9803435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Mäkelä M; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD001830. PubMed ID: 18843625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Worthington H; Mäkelä M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 15266455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.