334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34070344)
1. Validity Evaluation of an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) in Gait Analysis Using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM).
Park S; Yoon S
Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 34070344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring markers of aging and knee osteoarthritis gait using inertial measurement units.
Hafer JF; Provenzano SG; Kern KL; Agresta CE; Grant JA; Zernicke RF
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109567. PubMed ID: 31916999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower Extremity Inverse Kinematics Results Differ Between Inertial Measurement Unit- and Marker-Derived Gait Data.
Hafer JF; Mihy JA; Hunt A; Zernicke RF; Johnson RT
J Appl Biomech; 2023 Jun; 39(3):133-142. PubMed ID: 37024103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of Inertial Measurement Units to Measure Lower-Limb Kinematics and Pelvic Orientation at Submaximal and Maximal Effort Running Speeds.
Lin YC; Price K; Carmichael DS; Maniar N; Hickey JT; Timmins RG; Heiderscheit BC; Blemker SS; Opar DA
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(23):. PubMed ID: 38067972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Non-Restrictive Inertial Gait Analysis of Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Clinical Settings.
Haji Hassani R; Willi R; Rauter G; Bolliger M; Seel T
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor Single Axis Rotation Angles for Knee and Hip Flexion Angle Calculations During Gait.
Oliveira N; Park J; Barrance P
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2023; 11():80-86. PubMed ID: 36704243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real-time conversion of inertial measurement unit data to ankle joint angles using deep neural networks.
Senanayake D; Halgamuge S; Ackland DC
J Biomech; 2021 Aug; 125():110552. PubMed ID: 34237661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concurrent validity and within-session reliability of gait kinematics measured using an inertial motion capture system with repeated calibration.
Berner K; Cockcroft J; Morris LD; Louw Q
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Oct; 24(4):251-260. PubMed ID: 33218520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint Constraints Based Dynamic Calibration of IMU Position on Lower Limbs in IMU-MoCap.
Hu Q; Liu L; Mei F; Yang C
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of IMU measurements on running kinematics in non-rearfoot strike runners across different speeds.
Zeng Z; Liu Y; Wang L
J Sports Sci; 2023 Jun; 41(11):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 37733423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of an inertial measurement unit to assess pelvic orientation angles during gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: Comparison with an optoelectronic motion capture system.
Bolink SA; Naisas H; Senden R; Essers H; Heyligers IC; Meijer K; Grimm B
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 26711470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Body-Worn IMU-Based Human Hip and Knee Kinematics Estimation during Treadmill Walking.
McGrath T; Stirling L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pilot case series for concurrent validation of inertial measurement units to motion capture in individuals who use unilateral lower-limb prostheses.
Finco MG; Patterson RM; Moudy SC
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2023; 10():20556683231182322. PubMed ID: 37441370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inertial measurement unit-based motion capture to replace camera-based systems for assessing gait in healthy young adults: Proceed with caution.
Rekant J; Rothenberger S; Chambers A
Measur Sens; 2022 Oct; 23():. PubMed ID: 36506853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of Measurement for Trailing Limb Angle and Propulsion Force during Gait Using a Magnetic Inertial Measurement Unit.
Miyazaki T; Kawada M; Nakai Y; Kiyama R; Yone K
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8123467. PubMed ID: 31930138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinematics and temporospatial parameters during gait from inertial motion capture in adults with and without HIV: a validity and reliability study.
Berner K; Cockcroft J; Louw Q
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Jul; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 32709239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters.
Washabaugh EP; Kalyanaraman T; Adamczyk PG; Claflin ES; Krishnan C
Gait Posture; 2017 Jun; 55():87-93. PubMed ID: 28433867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inertial motion capture validation of 3D knee kinematics at various gait speed on the treadmill with a double-pose calibration.
Robert-Lachaine X; Parent G; Fuentes A; Hagemeister N; Aissaoui R
Gait Posture; 2020 Mar; 77():132-137. PubMed ID: 32035296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in Concurrent Validity of Two Independent Inertial Measurement Units Compared to Gold Standard for Upper Body Posture during Computerised Device Use.
Lee R; Akhundov R; James C; Edwards S; Snodgrass SJ
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(15):. PubMed ID: 37571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IMUs Can Estimate Hip and Knee Range of Motion during Walking Tasks but Are Not Sensitive to Changes in Load or Grade.
Fain A; McCarthy A; Nindl BC; Fuller JT; Wills JA; Doyle TLA
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38475210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
