These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34071881)

  • 1. Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Kuraoka N; Hashimoto S; Matsui S; Terai S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34071881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Keswani RN; Krishnan K; Wani S; Keefer L; Komanduri S
    Clin Endosc; 2014 May; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24944988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
    Sbeit W; Khoury T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for preoperative pancreatic solid lesions.
    Fujita A; Ryozawa S; Tanisaka Y; Ogawa T; Suzuki M; Katsuda H; Tashima T; Araki R; Mizuide M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 56(2):188-192. PubMed ID: 33295211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?
    Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW
    J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm).
    Sekine M; Miura T; Fujiwara J; Uehara T; Asano T; Matsumoto S; Miyatani H; Mashima H
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Mar; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33511507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
    Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
    Takagi T; Sugimoto M; Imamura H; Takahata Y; Nakajima Y; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Irie H; Nakamura J; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Kato T; Kobashi R; Hashimoto Y; Shibukawa G; Marubashi S; Hikichi T; Ohira H
    Clin Endosc; 2023 Jan; 56(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 36646425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.