These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

39 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3407229)

  • 1. [Emotional impression of prosodic speech markers].
    Bergmann G; Goldbeck T; Scherer KR
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1988; 35(2):167-200. PubMed ID: 3407229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Production-specific changes in emotional impression of speech: dimensions and acoustic correlates of impression formation].
    Tischer B
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1993; 40(4):644-75. PubMed ID: 8310720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encoding emotions in speech with the size code. A perceptual investigation.
    Chuenwattanapranithi S; Xu Y; Thipakorn B; Maneewongvatana S
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(4):210-30. PubMed ID: 19221452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intonation features of the expression of emotions in Spanish: preliminary study for a prosody assessment procedure.
    Martínez-Castilla P; Peppé S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(4-5):363-70. PubMed ID: 18415736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ERP investigation on the temporal dynamics of emotional prosody and emotional semantics in pseudo- and lexical-sentence context.
    Paulmann S; Kotz SA
    Brain Lang; 2008 Apr; 105(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 18177699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audio-visual speech perception is special.
    Tuomainen J; Andersen TS; Tiippana K; Sams M
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B13-22. PubMed ID: 15833302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
    Silbert N; de Jong K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech and music have different requirements for spectral resolution.
    Shannon RV
    Int Rev Neurobiol; 2005; 70():121-34. PubMed ID: 16472633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception processing.
    Lindgren R; Lindblom B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():57-70. PubMed ID: 6577576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis and synthesis of speech regarding cochlear implant.
    Carrat R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():85-94. PubMed ID: 6596855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of Parkinson's disease on vocal-prosodic communication from the perspective of listeners.
    Pell MD; Cheang HS; Leonard CL
    Brain Lang; 2006 May; 97(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 16226803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Dependence of the perception of emotional information of speech on the acoustic parameters of the stimulus in children of various ages].
    Dmitrieva ES; Gel'man VIa; Zaĭtseva KA; Orlov AM
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2008; 34(4):149-53. PubMed ID: 18924437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.
    Shukla M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 16782083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation frequency features for phoneme recognition in noisy speech.
    Ganapathy S; Thomas S; Hermansky H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):EL8-12. PubMed ID: 19173383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cues to perception of reduced flaps.
    Warner N; Fountain A; Tucker BV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3317-27. PubMed ID: 19425673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional contributions of the basal ganglia to emotional prosody: evidence from ERPs.
    Paulmann S; Pell MD; Kotz SA
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1217():171-8. PubMed ID: 18501336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic profiles of distinct emotional expressions in laughter.
    Szameitat DP; Alter K; Szameitat AJ; Wildgruber D; Sterr A; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):354-66. PubMed ID: 19603892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody.
    Meyer M; Steinhauer K; Alter K; Friederici AD; von Cramon DY
    Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 15068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.