235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34072538)
1. Roadside Drug Testing Approaches.
Alhefeiti MA; Barker J; Shah I
Molecules; 2021 May; 26(11):. PubMed ID: 34072538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of the Queensland 2007-2012 roadside drug testing program: The prevalence of three illicit drugs.
Davey J; Armstrong K; Martin P
Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Apr; 65():11-7. PubMed ID: 24389088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral fluid testing for marijuana intoxication: enhancing objectivity for roadside DUI testing.
Doucette ML; Frattaroli S; Vernick JS
Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 24(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 28572268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What to do when drivers test positive for methadone in roadside drug tests? The Spanish Experience.
Herrera-Gómez F; Alvarez FJ
Adicciones; 2019 Sep; 31(4):324-326. PubMed ID: 31018008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drugs and driving: the Finnish perspective.
Lillsunde P; Gunnar T
Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):213-29. PubMed ID: 21338023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A field test of substance use screening devices as part of routine drunk-driving spot detection operating procedures in South Africa.
Matzopoulos R; Lasarow A; Bowman B
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():118-24. PubMed ID: 23770390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Roadside drug testing: An evaluation of the Alere DDS
Rohrig TP; Moore CM; Stephens K; Cooper K; Coulter C; Baird T; Garnier M; Miller S; Tuyay J; Osawa K; Chou J; Nuss C; Collier J; Wittman KC
Drug Test Anal; 2018 Apr; 10(4):663-670. PubMed ID: 28879663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is law enforcement of drug-impaired driving cost-efficient? An explorative study of a methodology for cost-benefit analysis.
Veisten K; Houwing S; Mathijssen MP; Akhtar J
Int J Drug Policy; 2013 Mar; 24(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 23127668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical reliability of four oral fluid point-of-collection testing devices for drug detection in drivers.
Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Rabelo-da-Ponte FD; Silvestrin R; Ornell R; Sousa T; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110434. PubMed ID: 32758788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driving Under the Influence of Drugs: When the Law Misses the Mark.
Tiscione NB; Alford IK; Miller R; Shan X; Yeatman DT
J Anal Toxicol; 2019 Mar; 43(2):138-143. PubMed ID: 30272174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The utility of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) measures obtained from oral fluid samples in traffic safety.
Romano E; Moore C; Kelley-Baker T; Torres-Saavedra PA
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):667-672. PubMed ID: 31356118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Toxicological oral fluid results among Spanish drivers testing positive on on-site drug controls from 2013 to 2015.
Lema-Atán JÁ; de Castro A; Lendoiro E; López-Rivadulla M; Cruz A
Drug Alcohol Depend; 2019 Feb; 195():106-113. PubMed ID: 30611978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Police documentation of drug use in injured drivers: Implications for monitoring and preventing drug-impaired driving.
Brubacher JR; Chan H; Erdelyi S; Asbridge M; Mann RE; Purssell RA; Solomon R
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():200-206. PubMed ID: 29482896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A threshold LC-MS/MS method for 92 analytes in oral fluid collected with the Quantisal® device.
Desharnais B; Lajoie MJ; Laquerre J; Mireault P; Skinner CD
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110506. PubMed ID: 33035929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hair drug testing in the new Brazilian regulation to obtain professional driver's licence: no parallel to any other law enforcement in the world.
Leyton V; Andreuccetti G; de Almeida RM; Muñoz DR; Walls HC; Greve JM; da Costa Montal JH; Adura FE; Yonamine M
Addiction; 2015 Jul; 110(7):1207-8. PubMed ID: 25967396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Canada's new drug-impaired driving law: the need to consider other approaches.
Solomon R; Chamberlain E
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):685-93. PubMed ID: 24380375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drug driving in Italy. The results of the first roadside drug testing service utilizing on-site confirmatory analysis between 2019 and 2022.
Poetto AS; Catesini G; Dossetto P; Marchetti S; Addobbati R
Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Feb; 355():111929. PubMed ID: 38262308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What contributes to drug driving? An exploratory investigation into the influence of problematic substance use, roadside testing and alternative transport options.
Hasan R; Watson B; Haworth N; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 May; 184():106990. PubMed ID: 36791605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are oral fluid testing devices effective for the roadside detection of recent cannabis use? A systematic review.
Dobri SCD; Moslehi AH; Davies TC
Public Health; 2019 Jun; 171():57-65. PubMed ID: 31102828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Challenges associated with drunk driving measurement: combining police and self-reported data to estimate an accurate prevalence in Brazil.
Sousa T; Lunnen JC; Gonçalves V; Schmitz A; Pasa G; Bastos T; Sripad P; Chandran A; Pechansky F
Injury; 2013 Dec; 44 Suppl 4():S11-6. PubMed ID: 24377772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
