BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34075103)

  • 1. KAUST Metagenomic Analysis Platform (KMAP), enabling access to massive analytics of re-annotated metagenomic data.
    Alam I; Kamau AA; Ngugi DK; Gojobori T; Duarte CM; Bajic VB
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11511. PubMed ID: 34075103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publisher Correction: KAUST Metagenomic Analysis Platform (KMAP), enabling access to massive analytics of re-annotated metagenomic data.
    Alam I; Kamau AA; Ngugi DK; Gojobori T; Duarte CM; Bajic VB
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13992. PubMed ID: 34211073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MGS-Fast: Metagenomic shotgun data fast annotation using microbial gene catalogs.
    Brown SM; Chen H; Hao Y; Laungani BP; Ali TA; Dong C; Lijeron C; Kim B; Wultsch C; Pei Z; Krampis K
    Gigascience; 2019 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 30942867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. COGNIZER: A Framework for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Datasets.
    Bose T; Haque MM; Reddy C; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142102. PubMed ID: 26561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-purposing software for functional characterization of the microbiome.
    Gardiner LJ; Haiminen N; Utro F; Parida L; Seabolt E; Krishna R; Kaufman JH
    Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 33422152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tamock: simulation of habitat-specific benchmark data in metagenomics.
    Gerner SM; Graf AB; Rattei T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 22(1):227. PubMed ID: 33932979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Expanded Gene Catalog of Mouse Gut Metagenomes.
    Zhu J; Ren H; Zhong H; Li X; Zou Y; Han M; Li M; Madsen L; Kristiansen K; Xiao L
    mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MG-RAST, a Metagenomics Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function.
    Keegan KP; Glass EM; Meyer F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():207-33. PubMed ID: 26791506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elviz - exploration of metagenome assemblies with an interactive visualization tool.
    Cantor M; Nordberg H; Smirnova T; Hess M; Tringe S; Dubchak I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 25928663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of sequencing strategies and tools for taxonomic annotation: Defining standards for progressive metagenomics.
    Escobar-Zepeda A; Godoy-Lozano EE; Raggi L; Segovia L; Merino E; Gutiérrez-Rios RM; Juarez K; Licea-Navarro AF; Pardo-Lopez L; Sanchez-Flores A
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12034. PubMed ID: 30104688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MetaEuk-sensitive, high-throughput gene discovery, and annotation for large-scale eukaryotic metagenomics.
    Levy Karin E; Mirdita M; Söding J
    Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):48. PubMed ID: 32245390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metagenomics workflow for hybrid assembly, differential coverage binning, metatranscriptomics and pathway analysis (MUFFIN).
    Van Damme R; Hölzer M; Viehweger A; Müller B; Bongcam-Rudloff E; Brandt C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1008716. PubMed ID: 33561126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of sequencing depth on the inferred taxonomic composition and AMR gene content of metagenomic samples.
    Gweon HS; Shaw LP; Swann J; De Maio N; AbuOun M; Niehus R; Hubbard ATM; Bowes MJ; Bailey MJ; Peto TEA; Hoosdally SJ; Walker AS; Sebra RP; Crook DW; Anjum MF; Read DS; Stoesser N;
    Environ Microbiome; 2019 Oct; 14(1):7. PubMed ID: 33902704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A review on the bioinformatics pipelines for metagenomic research].
    Ye DD; Fan MM; Guan Q; Chen HJ; Ma ZS
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2012 Dec; 33(6):574-85. PubMed ID: 23266976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AgroSeek: a system for computational analysis of environmental metagenomic data and associated metadata.
    Liang X; Akers K; Keenum I; Wind L; Gupta S; Chen C; Aldaihani R; Pruden A; Zhang L; Knowlton KF; Xia K; Heath LS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):117. PubMed ID: 33691615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational workflow for the fine-grained analysis of metagenomic samples.
    Pérez-Wohlfeil E; Arjona-Medina JA; Torreno O; Ulzurrun E; Trelles O
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Oct; 17(Suppl 8):802. PubMed ID: 27801291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-Mesh: metagenomic data analysis system].
    Su X; Song B; Wang X; Ma X; Xu J; Ning K
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2014 Jan; 30(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 24818475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
    Zhang Q
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HOME-BIO (sHOtgun MEtagenomic analysis of BIOlogical entities): a specific and comprehensive pipeline for metagenomic shotgun sequencing data analysis.
    Ferravante C; Memoli D; Palumbo D; Ciaramella P; Di Loria A; D'Agostino Y; Nassa G; Rizzo F; Tarallo R; Weisz A; Giurato G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 22(Suppl 7):106. PubMed ID: 34225648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes.
    Olson ND; Treangen TJ; Hill CM; Cepeda-Espinoza V; Ghurye J; Koren S; Pop M
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 28968737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.