155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34075519)
1. Conditional Non-parametric Bootstrap for Non-linear Mixed Effect Models.
Comets E; Rodrigues C; Jullien V; Ursino M
Pharm Res; 2021 Jun; 38(6):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 34075519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of bootstrap methods for estimating uncertainty of parameters in nonlinear mixed-effects models: a simulation study in population pharmacokinetics.
Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2014 Feb; 41(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 24317870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods for meta-analysis.
Van Den Noortgate W; Onghena P
Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 16097340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. dOFV distributions: a new diagnostic for the adequacy of parameter uncertainty in nonlinear mixed-effects models applied to the bootstrap.
Dosne AG; Niebecker R; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 27730481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the estimation of parameter uncertainty distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models using sampling importance resampling.
Dosne AG; Bergstrand M; Harling K; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Dec; 43(6):583-596. PubMed ID: 27730482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two bootstrapping routines for obtaining imprecision estimates for nonparametric parameter distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models.
Baverel PG; Savic RM; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Feb; 38(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 21076858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Model-Based Bioequivalence Statistical Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Studies with Sparse Sampling.
Loingeville F; Bertrand J; Nguyen TT; Sharan S; Feng K; Sun W; Han J; Grosser S; Zhao L; Fang L; Möllenhoff K; Dette H; Mentré F
AAPS J; 2020 Oct; 22(6):141. PubMed ID: 33125589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extending the code in the open-source saemix package to fit joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data.
Lavalley-Morelle A; Mentré F; Comets E; Mullaert J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Apr; 247():108095. PubMed ID: 38422892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uncertainty Computation at Finite Distance in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models-a New Method Based on Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm.
Guhl M; Bertrand J; Fayette L; Mercier F; Comets E
AAPS J; 2024 Apr; 26(3):53. PubMed ID: 38722435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of uncertainty parameters estimated by different population PK software and methods.
Dartois C; Lemenuel-Diot A; Laveille C; Tranchand B; Tod M; Girard P
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Jun; 34(3):289-311. PubMed ID: 17216368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing parameter uncertainty in small-n pharmacometric analyses: value of the log-likelihood profiling-based sampling importance resampling (LLP-SIR) technique.
Broeker A; Wicha SG
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2020 Jun; 47(3):219-228. PubMed ID: 32248328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coverage and precision of confidence intervals for area under the curve using parametric and non-parametric methods in a toxicokinetic experimental design.
Bonate PL
Pharm Res; 1998 Mar; 15(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 9563069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the use of bootstrapping in cohort studies conducted with 1:1 propensity score matching-A plasmode simulation study.
Desai RJ; Wyss R; Abdia Y; Toh S; Johnson M; Lee H; Karami S; Major JM; Nguyen M; Wang SV; Franklin JM; Gagne JJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Jun; 28(6):879-886. PubMed ID: 31020732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation.
Briggs AH; Wonderling DE; Mooney CZ
Health Econ; 1997; 6(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 9285227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bootstrap method to avoid the effect of concurvity in generalised additive models in time series studies of air pollution.
Figueiras A; Roca-Pardiñas J; Cadarso-Suárez C
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Oct; 59(10):881-4. PubMed ID: 16166364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The study of long-term HIV dynamics using semi-parametric non-linear mixed-effects models.
Wu H; Zhang JT
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3655-75. PubMed ID: 12436462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
