These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34075646)

  • 1. Global and Regional Test-Retest Reproducibility of Native T1 and T2 Mapping in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Böttcher B; Lorbeer R; Stöcklein S; Beller E; Lang CI; Weber MA; Meinel FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1763-1772. PubMed ID: 34075646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous Mapping of T
    Hamilton JI; Pahwa S; Adedigba J; Frankel S; O'Connor G; Thomas R; Walker JR; Killinc O; Lo WC; Batesole J; Margevicius S; Griswold M; Rajagopalan S; Gulani V; Seiberlich N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 52(4):1044-1052. PubMed ID: 32222092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Myocardial T1 Values at 1.5 T: Normal Values for General Electric Scanners and Sex-Related Differences.
    Meloni A; Martini N; Positano V; D'Angelo G; Barison A; Todiere G; Grigoratos C; Barra V; Pistoia L; Gargani L; Ripoli A; Pepe A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Nov; 54(5):1486-1500. PubMed ID: 33848021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal Values of Magnetic Resonance T
    Deng W; Xue Y; Li Y; An S; Zheng J; Qian Y; Yue X; Wu Z; Yu Y; Zhao R; Li X
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Aug; 58(2):477-485. PubMed ID: 36426968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal myocardial native T
    Burkhardt BEU; Menghini C; Rücker B; Kellenberger CJ; Valsangiacomo Buechel ER
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Mar; 51(3):897-903. PubMed ID: 31507010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-scanner comparability of Z-scores for native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping.
    Razzaq S; Haririsanati L; Eyre K; Garg R; Chetrit M; Friedrich MG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024; 26(1):100004. PubMed ID: 38211657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Native myocardial T1 mapping: influence of spatial resolution on quantitative results and reproducibility.
    Dalmer A; Meinel FG; Böttcher B; Manzke M; Lorbeer R; Weber MA; Baeßler B; Klemenz AC
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jan; 14(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 38223095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiparametric myocardial mapping using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy dogs: Reproducibility, repeatability, and differences across slices, segments, and sequences.
    Yun D; Lee HW; Jin W; Lee K; Lee SK
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2024 Sep; 65(5):628-639. PubMed ID: 38958215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features from quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping.
    Marfisi D; Giannelli M; Marzi C; Del Meglio J; Barucci A; Masturzo L; Vignali C; Mascalchi M; Traino A; Casolo G; Diciotti S; Tessa C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Nov; 113():110217. PubMed ID: 39067653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in healthy Chinese adults: a multicenter 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Xu Z; Li W; Wang J; Wang F; Sun B; Xiang S; Luo X; Meng Y; Wang X; Wang X; Song J; Zhang M; Xu D; Zhou X; Ju Z; Sun J; Han Y; Chen Y
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Nov; 25(1):64. PubMed ID: 37968645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial native T
    Fahmy AS; El-Rewaidy H; Nezafat M; Nakamori S; Nezafat R
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 30636630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference Values for Water-Specific T1 of the Liver at 3 T: T2*-Compensation and the Confounding Effects of Fat.
    Thompson RB; Sherrington R; Beaulieu C; Kirkham A; Paterson DI; Seres P; Grenier J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Nov; 60(5):2063-2075. PubMed ID: 38305588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of area at risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction by T1- and T2-mapping sequences in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to Tc99m-sestamibi SPECT.
    Langhans B; Nadjiri J; Jähnichen C; Kastrati A; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Oct; 30(7):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24984612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference values for healthy human myocardium using a T1 mapping methodology: results from the International T1 Multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Dabir D; Child N; Kalra A; Rogers T; Gebker R; Jabbour A; Plein S; Yu CY; Otton J; Kidambi A; McDiarmid A; Broadbent D; Higgins DM; Schnackenburg B; Foote L; Cummins C; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Oct; 16(1):69. PubMed ID: 25384607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of spoiled gradient echo and steady-state free-precession imaging for native myocardial T1 mapping using the slice-interleaved T1 mapping (STONE) sequence.
    Jang J; Bellm S; Roujol S; Basha TA; Nezafat M; Kato S; Weingärtner S; Nezafat R
    NMR Biomed; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1486-96. PubMed ID: 27658506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Reveals Important Association of Fluid Status and T
    Donà C; Nitsche C; Anegg O; Poschner T; Koschutnik M; Duca F; Aschauer S; Dannenberg V; Schneider M; Schoenbauer R; Beitzke D; Loewe C; Hengstenberg C; Mascherbauer J; Kammerlander A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Dec; 56(6):1671-1679. PubMed ID: 35352420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 3 T: reference values, influencing factors and implications.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Prothmann M; Dieringer MA; Wassmuth R; Greiser A; Schwenke C; Niendorf T; Schulz-Menger J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jun; 15(1):53. PubMed ID: 23777327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers : Reference values and clinical implications.
    Granitz M; Motloch LJ; Granitz C; Meissnitzer M; Hitzl W; Hergan K; Schlattau A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2019 Apr; 131(7-8):143-155. PubMed ID: 30519737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart transplant patients: diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers: T2 mapping and extracellular volume fraction, for acute rejection diagnosis.
    Vermes E; Pantaléon C; Auvet A; Cazeneuve N; Machet MC; Delhommais A; Bourguignon T; Aupart M; Brunereau L
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Aug; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 30153847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. T1, T2, and Fat Fraction Cardiac MR Fingerprinting: Preliminary Clinical Evaluation.
    Jaubert O; Cruz G; Bustin A; Hajhosseiny R; Nazir S; Schneider T; Koken P; Doneva M; Rueckert D; Masci PG; Botnar RM; Prieto C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Apr; 53(4):1253-1265. PubMed ID: 33124081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.