196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34077430)
1. Employment impacts of the San Francisco sugar-sweetened beverage tax 2 years after implementation.
Marinello S; Leider J; Powell LM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252094. PubMed ID: 34077430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Higher Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Retail Prices After Excise Taxes in Oakland and San Francisco.
Falbe J; Lee MM; Kaplan S; Rojas NA; Ortega Hinojosa AM; Madsen KA
Am J Public Health; 2020 Jul; 110(7):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 32437271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.
Silver LD; Ng SW; Ryan-Ibarra S; Taillie LS; Induni M; Miles DR; Poti JM; Popkin BM
PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002283. PubMed ID: 28419108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.
Powell LM; Leider J; Oddo VM
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132271. PubMed ID: 34739061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on employment: A synthetic control analysis.
Marinello S; Leider J; Pugach O; Powell LM
Econ Hum Biol; 2021 Jan; 40():100939. PubMed ID: 33232891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.
Roberto CA; Lawman HG; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Peterhans A; Herring B; Bleich SN
JAMA; 2019 May; 321(18):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 32930704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distribution of sugar-sweetened beverage sales volume by sugar content in the United States: implications for tiered taxation and tax revenue.
Powell LM; Andreyeva T; Isgor Z
J Public Health Policy; 2020 Jun; 41(2):125-138. PubMed ID: 31969656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.
Bleich SN; Dunn CG; Soto MJ; Yan J; Gibson LA; Lawman HG; Mitra N; Lowery CM; Peterhans A; Hua SV; Roberto CA
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2113527. PubMed ID: 34129022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.
Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS
PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study.
Leider J; Li Y; Powell LM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244884. PubMed ID: 33395444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Changes in Beverage Prices and Volume Sold Following the Implementation and Repeal of a Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois.
Powell LM; Leider J
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2031083. PubMed ID: 33369659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Oakland, United States, 2015-2019: A quasi-experimental and cost-effectiveness study.
White JS; Basu S; Kaplan S; Madsen KA; Villas-Boas SB; Schillinger D
PLoS Med; 2023 Apr; 20(4):e1004212. PubMed ID: 37071600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Changes in Prices and Purchases Following Implementation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes Across the US.
Kaplan S; White JS; Madsen KA; Basu S; Villas-Boas SB; Schillinger D
JAMA Health Forum; 2024 Jan; 5(1):e234737. PubMed ID: 38180765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.
Altman EA; Madsen KA; Schmidt LA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33925290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in the first two years (2018 - 2020) of San Francisco's tax: A prospective longitudinal study.
Silver LD; Padon AA; Li L; Simard BJ; Greenfield TK
PLOS Glob Public Health; 2023; 3(1):e0001219. PubMed ID: 36963015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax on substitution to alcoholic beverages.
Powell LM; Leider J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262578. PubMed ID: 35041717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linking a sugar-sweetened beverage tax with fruit and vegetable subsidies: A simulation analysis of the impact on the poor.
Valizadeh P; Popkin BM; Ng SW
Am J Clin Nutr; 2022 Jan; 115(1):244-255. PubMed ID: 34610088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.
Falbe J; Grummon AH; Rojas N; Ryan-Ibarra S; Silver LD; Madsen KA
Am J Public Health; 2020 Sep; 110(9):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 32673112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: Impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children.
Cawley J; Frisvold D; Hill A; Jones D
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100865. PubMed ID: 32126505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longer-term impacts of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and volume sold at two-years post-tax.
Leider J; Powell LM
Soc Sci Med; 2022 Jan; 292():114537. PubMed ID: 34838326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
