133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34077556)
21. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.
Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 23288683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study.
Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in the Uterine Scar during the First Year after a Caesarean Section: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
van der Voet LF; Jordans IPM; Brölmann HAM; Veersema S; Huirne JAF
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 28957798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography.
Naji O; Wynants L; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23371440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sonographic assessment of post-cesarean section uterine scar in pregnant women.
Markovitch O; Tepper R; Hershkovitz R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 22928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Impact of Uterine Incision Closure Techniques on Post-cesarean Delivery Niche Formation and Size: Sonohysterographic Examination of Nonpregnant Women.
Antoine C; Meyer JA; Silverstein JS; Alexander J; Oh C; Timor-Tritsch IE
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1763-1771. PubMed ID: 34726789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sonographic evaluation of surgical repair of uterine cesarean scar defects.
Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 45(8):455-460. PubMed ID: 28186617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Roberge S; Demers S; Girard M; Vikhareva O; Markey S; Chaillet N; Moore L; Paris G; Bujold E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):507.e1-507.e6. PubMed ID: 26522861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.
Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Definition of large niche after Cesarean section based on prediction of postmenstrual spotting: Chinese cohort study in non-pregnant women.
Wang J; Pang Q; Wei W; Cheng L; Huang F; Cao Y; Hu M; Yan S; He Y; Wei Z
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 59(4):450-456. PubMed ID: 34806258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery.
Bhatia A; Palacio M; Wright AM; Yeo GSH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 34254386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.
Chueh HY; Pai AH; Su YY; Hsu CC; Chang FY; Yen CF
Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):643-645. PubMed ID: 35219475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Spiral Trial: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of Spiral thread sutures versus conventional thread sutures to prevent thinning of uterine scars following elective cesarean section.
Maki J; Nakatou H; Tani K; Eto E; Hayata K; Yamamoto D; Kai K; Tamada T; Akamatsu K; Kawanishi K; Nakamura K; Masuyama H
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106449. PubMed ID: 34023514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The association between uterine scar defect (niche) and the presence of symptoms.
Mohr-Sasson A; Dadon T; Brandt A; Shats M; Axcelrod M; Meyer R; Zajicek M; Haas J; Mashiach R
Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Aug; 47(2):103221. PubMed ID: 37277298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Uterine scar rupture - Prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management.
Tanos V; Toney ZA
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59():115-131. PubMed ID: 30837118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
