These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34078363)

  • 21. Multicenter study of autoverification methods of hematology analysis.
    Zhao X; Wang XF; Wang JB; Lu XJ; Zhao YW; Li CB; Wang BH; Wei J; Guo P; Xiao JP; Wang JH; Yang XL
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2016; 30(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 27358150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of rule-based autoverification protocols.
    Crolla LJ; Westgard JO
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 14531220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implications of autoverification for the clinical laboratory.
    Pearlman ES; Bilello L; Stauffer J; Kamarinos A; Miele R; Wolfert MS
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 12168427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
    Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementation and safety evaluation of autoverification for select low-risk, high-volume medications in the emergency department.
    Bienvenida A; Kroll C; Ruhland D; Steffenhagen A; Patterson BW; Halfpap J
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2022 Nov; 79(23):2150-2158. PubMed ID: 36062944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and implementation of an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory test results.
    Guidi GC; Poli G; Bassi A; Giobelli L; Benetollo PP; Lippi G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(11):1355-60. PubMed ID: 19817645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Establishing and validating of an laboratory information system-based auto-verification system for biochemical test results in cancer patients.
    Yan C; Zhang Y; Li J; Gao J; Cui C; Zhang C; Song G; Yu M; Mu J; Chen F; Han X; Cui W
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun; 33(5):e22877. PubMed ID: 30843281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Establishment of the intelligent verification criteria for a routine urinalysis analyzer in a multi-center study.
    Wang L; Guo Y; Han J; Jin J; Zheng C; Yang J; Xu J; Wang J; Wang X; Hao Y; Wu W; Liu G; Cui W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Nov; 57(12):1923-1932. PubMed ID: 31415235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Designing and validating an autoverification system of biochemical test results in Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, clinical laboratory.
    Gül BÜ; Özcan O; Doğan S; Arpaci A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2022 Oct; 32(3):030704. PubMed ID: 35966256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Artificial Neural Network Approach in Laboratory Test Reporting:  Learning Algorithms.
    Demirci F; Akan P; Kume T; Sisman AR; Erbayraktar Z; Sevinc S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Aug; 146(2):227-37. PubMed ID: 27473741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The development of autoverification rules applied to urinalysis performed on the AutionMAX-SediMAX platform.
    Palmieri R; Falbo R; Cappellini F; Soldi C; Limonta G; Brambilla P
    Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Oct; 485():275-281. PubMed ID: 29981288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits.
    Loh TP; Tan RZ; Lim CY; Markus C
    Ann Lab Med; 2022 Sep; 42(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 35470278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Autoverification process improvement by Six Sigma approach: Clinical chemistry & immunoassay.
    Randell EW; Short G; Lee N; Beresford A; Spencer M; Kennell M; Moores Z; Parry D
    Clin Biochem; 2018 May; 55():42-48. PubMed ID: 29518383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementation of the Autovalidation Algorithm for Clinical Chemistry Testing in the Laboratory Information System.
    Rimac V; Lapic I; Kules K; Rogic D; Miler M
    Lab Med; 2018 Jul; 49(3):284-291. PubMed ID: 29432621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laboratory Information System - Where are we Today?
    Lukić V
    J Med Biochem; 2017 Sep; 36(3):220-224. PubMed ID: 30564059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automation of chromatographic peak review and order to result data transfer in a clinical mass spectrometry laboratory.
    Vicente FB; Lin DC; Haymond S
    Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Nov; 498():84-89. PubMed ID: 31421120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Autoverification-based algorithms to detect preanalytical errors: Two examples.
    Wei R; Légaré W; McShane AJ
    Clin Biochem; 2023 May; 115():126-128. PubMed ID: 35779575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Increased effectiveness of urinalysis testing via the integration of automated instrumentation, the lean management approach, and autoverification.
    Wongkrajang P; Reesukumal K; Pratumvinit B
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Jan; 34(1):e23029. PubMed ID: 31498499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decision Support to Enhance Automated Laboratory Testing by Leveraging Analytical Capabilities.
    Tuthill JM
    Clin Lab Med; 2019 Jun; 39(2):259-267. PubMed ID: 31036279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Developing an efficient scheduling template of a chemotherapy treatment unit: A case study.
    Ahmed Z; Elmekkawy T; Bates S
    Australas Med J; 2011; 4(10):575-88. PubMed ID: 23386870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.