135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34080129)
1. High-dose-rate brachytherapy using inverse planning optimization with tandem and ovoid applicators for locally advanced cervical cancer: a simulation study.
Yaegashi Y; Sasaki K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Sep; 14(3):262-270. PubMed ID: 34080129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Point A vs. HR-CTV D
Harmon G; Diak A; Shea SM; Yacoub JH; Small W; Harkenrider MM
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):825-831. PubMed ID: 27693173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practically achievable maximum high-risk clinical target volume doses in MRI-guided intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a planning study.
Menon G; Huang F; Sloboda R; Pearcey R; Ghosh S
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 25085455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel two-step optimization method for tandem and ovoid high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Sharma M; Fields EC; Todor DA
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 26092424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamics of High Risk Clinical Target Volume reduction during Brachytherapy and impact on its coverage in patients with inoperable cervical cancer.
Pobijakova M; Scepanovic D; Paluga M; Fekete M; Mardiak J
Neoplasma; 2018 Mar; 65(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 29788726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 45 or 50 Gy, Which is the Optimal Radiotherapy Pelvic Dose in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Perspective of Reaching Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Adaptive Brachytherapy Planning Aims?
Mazeron R; Petit C; Rivin E; Limkin E; Dumas I; Maroun P; Annede P; Martinetti F; Seisen T; Lefkopoulos D; Chargari C; Haie-Meder C
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 26547694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Dosimetric Influence of Applicator Displacement on 2D and 3D Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Treatment.
Wu A; Tang D; Wu A; Liu Y; Qian L; Zhu L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211041201. PubMed ID: 34569371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose-volume histogram analysis of composite EQD2 dose distributions using the central shielding technique in cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Tamaki T; Noda SE; Ohno T; Kumazaki Y; Kato S; Nakano T
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 27475482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-guided treatment-planning optimisation in intracavitary or combined intracavitary/interstitial PDR brachytherapy using tandem ovoid applicators in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Tersteeg RJ; Roesink JM; Bijmolt S; Nomden CN; Moerland MA; de Leeuw AA
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 19748695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment planning for high dose rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer based on total dose constraints.
Bahadur YA; Constantinescu CT; Hassouna AH; El-Sayed ME
Saudi Med J; 2011 May; 32(5):495-503. PubMed ID: 21556471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Boost modalities in cervical cancer: dosimetric comparison between intracavitary BT vs. intracavitary + interstitial BT vs. SBRT.
Benkhaled S; Diakité K; Jullian N; Poeta S; Vandekerkhove C; Van Houtte P; Van Gestel D; De Caluwé A
Radiat Oncol; 2023 Jun; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 37381016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Annede P; Dumas I; Schernberg A; Tailleur A; Fumagalli I; Bockel S; Mignot F; Kissel M; Deutsch E; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 30797698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dosimetric parameters in the treatment planning of magnetic resonance imaging-based intracavitary image-guided adaptive brachytherapy with and without optimization using the central shielding technique.
Nishikawa R; Yoshida K; Ebina Y; Omoteda M; Miyawaki D; Ishihara T; Ejima Y; Akasaka H; Satoh H; Kyotani K; Takahashi S; Sasaki R
J Radiat Res; 2018 May; 59(3):316-326. PubMed ID: 29518234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer brachytherapy target and normal tissue contouring.
Eskander RN; Scanderbeg D; Saenz CC; Brown M; Yashar C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jan; 20(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 20130502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications for dosimetric changes when introducing MR-guided brachytherapy for small volume cervix cancer: a comparison of CT and MR-based treatments in a single centre.
Dempsey C; Govindarajulu G; Sridharan S; Capp A; O'Brien P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 37(4):705-12. PubMed ID: 25344886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed Tomography-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Introduction of the Technique and a Comparison of Dosimetry With Conventional Intracavitary Brachytherapy.
Liu ZS; Guo J; Zhao YZ; Lin X; Zhang BY; Zhang C; Wang HY; Yu L; Ren XJ; Wang TJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):768-775. PubMed ID: 28267131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of 3D image-based PDR brachytherapy on outcome of patients treated for cervix carcinoma in France: results of the French STIC prospective study.
Charra-Brunaud C; Harter V; Delannes M; Haie-Meder C; Quetin P; Kerr C; Castelain B; Thomas L; Peiffert D
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jun; 103(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 22633469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of rectal volume correlation with dosimetric parameters during optimized intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer.
Shahbazian H; Birgani MJT; Bagheri A; Arvandi S; Razmjoo S; Ghadamgahi P; Bakhali R; Feli M
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2020 Apr; 12(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 32395146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy.
Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
