These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3408019)

  • 1. Restriction of bacterial growth under commercial catheter dressings.
    Aly R; Bayles C; Maibach H
    Am J Infect Control; 1988 Jun; 16(3):95-100. PubMed ID: 3408019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.
    Maki DG; Stolz SS; Wheeler S; Mermel LA
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1729-37. PubMed ID: 7956275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.
    Webster J; Gillies D; O'Riordan E; Sherriff KL; Rickard CM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; (11):CD003827. PubMed ID: 22071809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.
    Gillies D; O'Riordan L; Carr D; Frost J; Gunning R; O'Brien I
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (4):CD003827. PubMed ID: 14583995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings.
    Hoffmann KK; Western SA; Kaiser DL; Wenzel RP; Groschel DH
    Am J Infect Control; 1988 Jun; 16(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 3408013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing.
    Maki DG; Ringer M
    JAMA; 1987 Nov; 258(17):2396-403. PubMed ID: 3118061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central venous catheter dressings: a systematic review.
    Gillies D; O'Riordan E; Carr D; O'Brien I; Frost J; Gunning R
    J Adv Nurs; 2003 Dec; 44(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 14651685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing.
    Weber RS; Hankins P; Limitone E; Callender D; Frankenthaler RM; Wolf P; Goepfert H
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 121(10):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7546582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gauze vs. plastic for peripheral intravenous dressings: testing a new technology.
    Littenberg B; Thompson L
    J Gen Intern Med; 1987; 2(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 3694302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral intravenous catheter dressing and securement practice is associated with site complications and suboptimal dressing integrity: A secondary analysis of 40,637 catheters.
    Corley A; Ullman AJ; Mihala G; Ray-Barruel G; Alexandrou E; Rickard CM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Dec; 100():103409. PubMed ID: 31629208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of synthetic adhesive moisture vapor permeable and fine mesh gauze dressings for split-thickness skin graft donor sites.
    Barnett A; Berkowitz RL; Mills R; Vistnes LM
    Am J Surg; 1983 Mar; 145(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 6340546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of 'Op-site' and 'Nobecutan gauze' dressings for central venous line care.
    Andersen PT; Herlevsen P; Schaumburg H
    J Hosp Infect; 1986 Mar; 7(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 2871079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings.
    Salles FT; Santos VL; Secoli SR; Aron S; Debbio CB; Baptista CC; Rogenski NM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Sep; 53(9):26-33. PubMed ID: 17893427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of a nitric oxide dressing in decreasing bacterial counts on human skin.
    Nye R; Robinia K; Peterson P; Jodoin Z; Bohm M; Anderman M; Peacock T; Moody M; Naimi A; Sharp J
    J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(Sup7):S19-S25. PubMed ID: 30008253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in microorganism growth on various dressings used to cover injection sites: inspection of the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli.
    Kawamura H; Takahashi N; Takahashi M; Taketomi A
    Surg Today; 2014 Dec; 44(12):2339-44. PubMed ID: 24871954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications.
    Marsh N; Webster J; Mihala G; Rickard CM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD011070. PubMed ID: 26068958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.
    Tripepi-Bova KA; Woods KD; Loach MC
    Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9283675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Increased risk of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters covered with transparent adhesive polyurethane bandages, compared to classical gauze bandages].
    Meylan PR
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Dec; 117(50):2013-6. PubMed ID: 3324330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dressing and securement for central venous access devices (CVADs): A Cochrane systematic review.
    Ullman AJ; Cooke ML; Mitchell M; Lin F; New K; Long DA; Mihala G; Rickard CM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Jul; 59():177-96. PubMed ID: 27222463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of transparent adherent and dry sterile gauze dressings for long-term central catheters in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant.
    Shivnan JC; McGuire D; Freedman S; Sharkazy E; Bosserman G; Larson E; Grouleff P
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(8):1349-56. PubMed ID: 1762975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.