These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34080238)

  • 1. Randomized Clinical Trial comparing clinical adjustment times of CAD/CAM screw-retained posterior crowns on ti-base abutments created with digital or conventional impressions. One-year follow-up.
    Derksen W; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Aug; 32(8):962-970. PubMed ID: 34080238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Randomized Clinical Trial comparing the clinical fit of CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDP) on ti-base abutments based on digital or conventional impression techniques. One year follow-up.
    Derksen W; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):733–743. PubMed ID: 33662051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial on Screw-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Restorations on Ti-Base Abutments Based on Digital or Conventional Impression Techniques.
    Derksen W; Wismeijer D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; 36(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 37699181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Ren S; Jiang X; Lin Y; Di P
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 34748653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-efficiency and cost-analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double-blinded RCT.
    Joda T; Gintaute A; Brägger U; Ferrari M; Weber K; Zitzmann NU
    J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103779. PubMed ID: 34391875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
    Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1401-1406. PubMed ID: 27796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.
    De Angelis P; Passarelli PC; Gasparini G; Boniello R; D'Amato G; De Angelis S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 31202552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A pilot clinical study of immediate provisionalization with a chairside computer aided design and computer aided manufacture monolithic crown for single tooth immediate implant placement].
    Tian JH; Di P; Lin Y; Zhang Y; Wei DH; Cui HY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 52(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 28072987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical outcome of single posterior implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated using full digital workflow and conventional workflow: a 3-year follow-up].
    Gao SH; Guo DN; Zhou YS; Pan SX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 57(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 35280005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial.
    Pan S; Guo D; Zhou Y; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jul; 30(7):617-626. PubMed ID: 31021451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns Following a Digital and Conventional Workflow: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Beck F; Zupancic Cepic L; Lettner S; Moritz A; Ulm C; Zechner W; Schedle A
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38256565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing digital and conventional workflows for treatment with posterior single-unit implant restorations: A randomized controlled trial.
    Kunavisarut C; Jarangkul W; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Joda T
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103875. PubMed ID: 34728252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A crossover clinical trial.
    Lee SJ; Jamjoom FZ; Le T; Radics A; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 33602542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up.
    Joda T; Ferrari M; Brägger U
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 28093860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrasubject comparison of digital vs. conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: Prosthodontic and patient-centered outcomes.
    Delize V; Bouhy A; Lambert F; Lamy M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):892-902. PubMed ID: 31183902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
    Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.