256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34081715)
21. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children.
Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of Wrist Accelerometer Cut-Points for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity in Youth.
Trost SG; Brookes DSK; Ahmadi MN
Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():884307. PubMed ID: 35585912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cross-validation of Actigraph derived accelerometer cut-points for assessment of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in children aged 8-11 years.
Duncan MJ; Eyre ELJ; Cox V; Roscoe CMP; Faghy MA; Tallis J; Dobell A
Acta Paediatr; 2020 Sep; 109(9):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 31984545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke.
Moulaee Conradsson D; Bezuidenhout LJ
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of ActiGraph GT3X+ placement location in the estimation of energy expenditure during moderate and high-intensity physical activities in young and older adults.
Kossi O; Lacroix J; Ferry B; Batcho CS; Julien-Vergonjanne A; Mandigout S
J Sports Sci; 2021 Jul; 39(13):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 33514289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accelerometer cut-points derived during over-ground walking in persons with mild, moderate, and severe multiple sclerosis.
Sandroff BM; Riskin BJ; Agiovlasitis S; Motl RW
J Neurol Sci; 2014 May; 340(1-2):50-7. PubMed ID: 24635890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5-8 years old.
Duncan MJ; Wilson S; Tallis J; Eyre E
Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 175(12):2019-2021. PubMed ID: 27785561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors.
Hildebrand M; VAN Hees VT; Hansen BH; Ekelund U
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1816-24. PubMed ID: 24887173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effect of Sensor Placement and Number on Physical Activity Recognition and Energy Expenditure Estimation in Older Adults: Validation Study.
Davoudi A; Mardini MT; Nelson D; Albinali F; Ranka S; Rashidi P; Manini TM
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e23681. PubMed ID: 33938809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Forman JL; Trost SG
J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hip and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data Analysis for Toddler Activities.
Kwon S; Zavos P; Nickele K; Sugianto A; Albert MV
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 31330889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimating Physical Activity in Children Aged 8-11 Years Using Accelerometry: Contributions From Fundamental Movement Skills and Different Accelerometer Placements.
Duncan MJ; Roscoe CMP; Faghy M; Tallis J; Eyre ELJ
Front Physiol; 2019; 10():242. PubMed ID: 30936837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Daily Physical Activity Among Toddlers: Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Assessments.
Kwon S; Honegger K; Mason M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(21):. PubMed ID: 31683776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intensity classification accuracy of accelerometer-measured physical activities in Chinese children and youth.
Zhu Z; Chen P; Zhuang J
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Dec; 84 Suppl 2():S4-11. PubMed ID: 24527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Defining accelerometer cut-points for different intensity levels in motor-complete spinal cord injury.
Holmlund T; Ekblom-Bak E; Franzén E; Hultling C; Wahman K
Spinal Cord; 2020 Jan; 58(1):116-124. PubMed ID: 31243318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparability of published cut-points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization.
Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Tudor-Locke C; Löf M; Esteban-Cornejo I; Molina-Garcia P; Mora-Gonzalez J; Rodriguez-Ayllon M; Garcia-Marmol E; Ekelund U; Ortega FB
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2019 Apr; 29(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 30548545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth.
Trost SG; Loprinzi PD; Moore R; Pfeiffer KA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jul; 43(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 21131873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Absolute intensity thresholds for tri-axial wrist and waist accelerometer-measured movement behaviors in adults.
Mielke GI; de Almeida Mendes M; Ekelund U; Rowlands AV; Reichert FF; Crochemore-Silva I
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2023 Sep; 33(9):1752-1764. PubMed ID: 37306308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Individualized Relative-Intensity Physical Activity Accelerometer Cut Points.
Siddique J; Aaby D; Montag SE; Sidney S; Sternfeld B; Welch WA; Carnethon MR; Liu K; Craft LL; Pettee Gabriel K; Barone Gibbs B; Reis JP; Freedson P
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 Feb; 52(2):398-407. PubMed ID: 31524826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accelerometer Cut-Points for Physical Activity Assessment in Adults with Mild to Moderate Huntington's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study.
Simón-Vicente L; Rivadeneyra-Posadas J; Soto-Célix M; Raya-González J; Castillo D; Calvo S; Collazo C; Rodríguez-Fernández A; Fahed VS; Mariscal N; García-Bustillo Á; Aguado L; Cubo E
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
