BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34081851)

  • 41. BigBind: Learning from Nonstructural Data for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Brocidiacono M; Francoeur P; Aggarwal R; Popov KI; Koes DR; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2488-2495. PubMed ID: 38113513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. FINDSITE
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. PharmaNet: Pharmaceutical discovery with deep recurrent neural networks.
    Ruiz Puentes P; Valderrama N; González C; Daza L; Muñoz-Camargo C; Cruz JC; Arbeláez P
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0241728. PubMed ID: 33901196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. DeepBindGCN: Integrating Molecular Vector Representation with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Protein-Ligand Interaction Prediction.
    Zhang H; Saravanan KM; Zhang JZH
    Molecules; 2023 Jun; 28(12):. PubMed ID: 37375246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Pose Classification Using Three-Dimensional Atomic Structure-Based Neural Networks Applied to Ion Channel-Ligand Docking.
    Shim H; Kim H; Allen JE; Wulff H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 May; 62(10):2301-2315. PubMed ID: 35447030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. FRAGSITE2: A structure and fragment-based approach for virtual ligand screening.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    Protein Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e4869. PubMed ID: 38100293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN-based Multi-body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI-score) Based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Khashan R; Tropsha A; Zheng W
    Mol Inform; 2022 Aug; 41(8):e2100248. PubMed ID: 35142086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Employing Molecular Conformations for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening with Equivariant Graph Neural Network and Deep Multiple Instance Learning.
    Gu Y; Li J; Kang H; Zhang B; Zheng S
    Molecules; 2023 Aug; 28(16):. PubMed ID: 37630234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. DeepBSP-a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Docking Structures.
    Bao J; He X; Zhang JZH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 May; 61(5):2231-2240. PubMed ID: 33979150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Emulating Docking Results Using a Deep Neural Network: A New Perspective for Virtual Screening.
    Jastrzębski S; Szymczak M; Pocha A; Mordalski S; Tabor J; Bojarski AJ; Podlewska S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4246-4262. PubMed ID: 32865414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Deffini: A family-specific deep neural network model for structure-based virtual screening.
    Zhou D; Liu F; Zheng Y; Hu L; Huang T; Huang YS
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt B):106323. PubMed ID: 36436482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Enhancing generalizability and performance in drug-target interaction identification by integrating pharmacophore and pre-trained models.
    Zhang Z; He X; Long D; Luo G; Chen S
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Jun; 40(Supplement_1):i539-i547. PubMed ID: 38940179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Water Network-Augmented Two-State Model for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Qu X; Dong L; Luo D; Si Y; Wang B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2263-2274. PubMed ID: 37433009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Novel Consensus Docking Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Ren X; Shi YS; Zhang Y; Liu B; Zhang LH; Peng YB; Zeng R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 30044626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
    Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. ViTScore: A Novel Three-Dimensional Vision Transformer Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Docking Poses.
    Guo L; Qiu T; Wang J
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2023 Oct; 22(4):734-743. PubMed ID: 37159314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Local Interaction Density (LID), a Fast and Efficient Tool to Prioritize Docking Poses.
    Jacquemard C; Tran-Nguyen VK; Drwal MN; Rognan D; Kellenberger E
    Molecules; 2019 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 31323745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Electrostatic-field and surface-shape similarity for virtual screening and pose prediction.
    Cleves AE; Johnson SR; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Oct; 33(10):865-886. PubMed ID: 31650386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Predicting protein-ligand binding residues with deep convolutional neural networks.
    Cui Y; Dong Q; Hong D; Wang X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):93. PubMed ID: 30808287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.