These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34081851)

  • 61. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening.
    Chen L; Cruz A; Ramsey S; Dickson CJ; Duca JS; Hornak V; Koes DR; Kurtzman T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220113. PubMed ID: 31430292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Representability of algebraic topology for biomolecules in machine learning based scoring and virtual screening.
    Cang Z; Mu L; Wei GW
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005929. PubMed ID: 29309403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Improving the Virtual Screening Ability of Target-Specific Scoring Functions Using Deep Learning Methods.
    Wang D; Cui C; Ding X; Xiong Z; Zheng M; Luo X; Jiang H; Chen K
    Front Pharmacol; 2019; 10():924. PubMed ID: 31507420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Cosolvent-Based Protein Pharmacophore for Ligand Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Lopez ED; Burastero O; Modenutti CP; Barril X; Marti MA; Turjanski AG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3572-3583. PubMed ID: 31373819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Improving Protein-Ligand Docking Results with High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Guterres H; Im W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Apr; 60(4):2189-2198. PubMed ID: 32227880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction.
    Li H; Leung KS; Wong MH; Ballester PJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(Suppl 11):308. PubMed ID: 28185549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A D3R prospective evaluation of machine learning for protein-ligand scoring.
    Sunseri J; Ragoza M; Collins J; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):761-771. PubMed ID: 27592011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Rapid activity prediction of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors: harnessing docking energetic components for empirical scoring by chemometric and artificial neural network approaches.
    Thangsunan P; Kittiwachana S; Meepowpan P; Kungwan N; Prangkio P; Hannongbua S; Suree N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Jun; 30(6):471-88. PubMed ID: 27314501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. CSConv2d: A 2-D Structural Convolution Neural Network with a Channel and Spatial Attention Mechanism for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Wang X; Liu D; Zhu J; Rodriguez-Paton A; Song T
    Biomolecules; 2021 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33925310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. DeepBindBC: A practical deep learning method for identifying native-like protein-ligand complexes in virtual screening.
    Zhang H; Zhang T; Saravanan KM; Liao L; Wu H; Zhang H; Zhang H; Pan Y; Wu X; Wei Y
    Methods; 2022 Sep; 205():247-262. PubMed ID: 35878751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Predicting target-ligand interactions with graph convolutional networks for interpretable pharmaceutical discovery.
    Ruiz Puentes P; Rueda-Gensini L; Valderrama N; Hernández I; González C; Daza L; Muñoz-Camargo C; Cruz JC; Arbeláez P
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8434. PubMed ID: 35589824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 1. Compilation of the test set.
    Li Y; Liu Z; Li J; Han L; Liu J; Zhao Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1700-16. PubMed ID: 24716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. GraphscoreDTA: optimized graph neural network for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Wang K; Zhou R; Tang J; Li M
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jun; 39(6):. PubMed ID: 37225408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. DENVIS: Scalable and High-Throughput Virtual Screening Using Graph Neural Networks with Atomic and Surface Protein Pocket Features.
    Krasoulis A; Antonopoulos N; Pitsikalis V; Theodorakis S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Oct; 62(19):4642-4659. PubMed ID: 36154119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A new paradigm for applying deep learning to protein-ligand interaction prediction.
    Wang Z; Wang S; Li Y; Guo J; Wei Y; Mu Y; Zheng L; Li W
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38581420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Convolutional Neural Network-based Virtual Screening.
    Shan W; Li X; Yao H; Lin K
    Curr Med Chem; 2021; 28(10):2033-2047. PubMed ID: 32452320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A Small Step Toward Generalizability: Training a Machine Learning Scoring Function for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Scantlebury J; Vost L; Carbery A; Hadfield TE; Turnbull OM; Brown N; Chenthamarakshan V; Das P; Grosjean H; von Delft F; Deane CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2960-2974. PubMed ID: 37166179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 25916860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.