BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34082461)

  • 1. Comparing Simultaneous Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements Using Three Different Extratympanic Electrodes.
    Lefler SM; Kaf WA; Ferraro JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jun; 32(6):339-346. PubMed ID: 34082461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Test, Electrode, and Rate on Electrocochleography Measures.
    Lake AB; Stuart A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 30461400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast Click Rate Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response in Normal-Hearing Adults Using Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution.
    Kaf WA; Lewis KM; Yavuz E; Dixon SM; Van Ess M; Jamos AM; Delgado RE
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 27861251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function.
    Krieg SM; Kempf L; Droese D; Rosahl SK; Meyer B; Lehmberg J
    J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1042-7. PubMed ID: 24559226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tympanic electrocochleography with disposable electrode].
    Matsuura K; Tono T; Hara Y; Ueki Y; Ushisako Y; Morimitsu T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jul; 99(7):1016-25. PubMed ID: 8776976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined intra-operative monitoring of hearing by means of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) during surgery of intra- and extrameatal acoustic neurinomas.
    Schlake HP; Milewski C; Goldbrunner RH; Kindgen A; Riemann R; Helms J; Roosen K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2001 Oct; 143(10):985-95; discussion 995-6. PubMed ID: 11685605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous Extratympanic Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Responses Revisited.
    Minaya C; Atcherson SR
    Audiol Res; 2015 Jan; 5(1):105. PubMed ID: 26557358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tympanic ECochG and conventional ABR: a combined approach for the identification of wave I and the I-V interwave interval.
    Ferraro JA; Ferguson R
    Ear Hear; 1989 Jun; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 2744251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear Microphonic and Summating Potential Responses from Click-Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in High-Risk and Normal Infants.
    Hunter LL; Blankenship CM; Gunter RG; Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Brown DK; Baroch K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 May; 29(5):427-442. PubMed ID: 29708492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrocochleography: using extratympanic or transtympanic methods?
    Probst R
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1983; 45(6):322-9. PubMed ID: 6646667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the location of electrode on tympanic membrane matter when recording electrocochleography?
    Zakaria MN; Nik Othman NA; Musa Z
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Nov; 141(11):984-988. PubMed ID: 34669557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimum Detectable Differences in Electrocochleography Measurements: Bayesian-Based Predictions.
    Goodman SS; Lichtenhan JT; Jennings SG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Apr; 24(2):217-237. PubMed ID: 36795197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of adaptation on electrocochleography and auditory brain-stem responses in the elderly.
    Soucek S; Mason SM
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 1439500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the use of tympanic and extratympanic electrodes for electrocochleography.
    Bonucci AS; Hyppolito MA
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Mar; 119(3):563-6. PubMed ID: 19235755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Attias J; Nageris B; Ralph J; Vajda J; Rappaport ZH
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):178-84. PubMed ID: 18389413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Auditory brainstem response and extratympanic recorded electrocochleography in patients with multiple and severe handicaps].
    Kaga M; Suzuki H; Sone S; Kaga K; Araki A; Hirayama Y
    No To Hattatsu; 1991 Jan; 23(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1825275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using concha electrodes to measure cochlear microphonic waveforms and auditory brainstem responses.
    Zhang M
    Trends Amplif; 2010 Dec; 14(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 21131635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative neuromonitoring for superior semicircular canal dehiscence and hearing outcomes.
    Wenzel A; Ward BK; Ritzl EK; Gutierrez-Hernandez S; Della Santina CC; Minor LB; Carey JP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 25333320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory brainstem responses and extratympanic electrocochleography. A threshold comparison in children.
    Fjermedal O; Laukli E; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 3232025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ABR amplitudes with TIPtrode and mastoid electrodes.
    Bauch CD; Olsen WO
    Ear Hear; 1990 Dec; 11(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 2073982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.