These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34083907)

  • 1. Evaluation of compressive strength, shear bond strength, and microhardness values of glass-ionomer cement Type IX and Cention N.
    Verma V; Mathur S; Sachdev V; Singh D
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(6):550-553. PubMed ID: 34083907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study.
    Jaidka S; Somani R; Singh DJ; Shafat S
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Apr; 6(Suppl 1):S64-9. PubMed ID: 27195231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.
    Balagopal S; Nekkanti S; Kaur K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 34257171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and Comparison of Physical Properties of Cention N with Other Restorative Materials in Artificial Saliva: An
    Adsul PS; Dhawan P; Tuli A; Khanduri N; Singh A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):350-355. PubMed ID: 35991795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N and Its Comparison with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) Restorative Material as Used in Primary Teeth.
    Pai D; Anirudhmaadhava PA; Ginjupalli K
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2024; 2024():9420336. PubMed ID: 38205145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.
    Sujith R; Yadav TG; Pitalia D; Babaji P; Apoorva K; Sharma A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):691-695. PubMed ID: 33025941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Type IX Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An
    Bethapudy DR; Bhat C; Lakade L; Chaudhary S; Kunte S; Patil S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 37457201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials.
    Kumari A; Singh N
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2022; 9(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35174335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical and dentin bond strength properties of the nanosilver enriched glass ionomer cement.
    Jowkar Z; Jowkar M; Shafiei F
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Mar; 11(3):e275-e281. PubMed ID: 31001399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An
    Somani R; Jaidka S; Singh DJ; Sibal GK
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(3):192-196. PubMed ID: 27843248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical, antibacterial and bond strength properties of nano-titanium-enriched glass ionomer cement.
    Garcia-Contreras R; Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Contreras-Bulnes R; Sakagami H; Morales-Luckie RA; Nakajima H
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 26221928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material.
    Moshaverinia M; Navas A; Jahedmanesh N; Shah KC; Moshaverinia A; Ansari S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 31326149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and surface microhardness of EQUIA Forte, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with conventional glass-ionomer cement.
    Poornima P; Koley P; Kenchappa M; Nagaveni NB; Bharath KP; Neena IE
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(3):265-270. PubMed ID: 31584026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three different glass ionomer cement (conventional, zirconium-reinforced and advanced glass hybrid) in primary molars: an in vitro study.
    Agrawal I; Katge F; Patil D; Pradhan D; Nisar P
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 24(4):491-497. PubMed ID: 37341921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of compressive strength, surface microhardness, solubility and antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer dental cement reinforced with silver doped carbon nanotube fillers.
    Hamdy TM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):777. PubMed ID: 37872523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Adhesive Bond Strength of Conventional GIC and Cention N to Enamel and Dentin of Primary Teeth: An
    Dhull KS; Dutta B; Pattnaik S; Samir PV; Devraj IM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(4):412-416. PubMed ID: 36875970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An
    Chandru TP; Chandran S; Peedikayil FC; Kottayi S; Aparna TP; Aravind A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(5):707-710. PubMed ID: 38162236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Hybrid Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials to Dentin: An In-Vitro Study.
    Agarwal K; Bharati L; Agarwal S; Yadav V; Marvaniya J; Shyamal R
    Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60123. PubMed ID: 38864074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the Influence of Thermocycling on Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Microhardness in Green-Mediated Nanocomposite-Enhanced Glass Ionomer Cement Compared to Traditional Glass Ionomer Cement.
    Ravi B; Paulraj J; Maiti S; Shanmugam R
    Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56078. PubMed ID: 38618398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.