These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34084288)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system.
    Kelkar KC; Bhat V; Hegde C
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():1. PubMed ID: 34084288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
    Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible With Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Yu W; Chen S; Ma L; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 35546271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].
    Yu WQ; Li XQ; Chen SY; Ma XN; Xu X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 33557504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study.
    Topcu Ersöz MB; Mumcu E
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 14(6):346-359. PubMed ID: 36685790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
    Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Stress Distribution and Deformation of Four Prosthetic Materials in Full-mouth Rehabilitation with Implants: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Chand YB; Mahendra J; Jigeesh N; Mahendra L; Shivasubramanian L; Perika SB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 33850065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress distribution around different abutments on titanium and CFR-PEEK implant with different prosthetic crowns under parafunctional loading: A 3D FEA study.
    Mourya A; Nahar R; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(2):313-320. PubMed ID: 33816100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study between zirconia and titanium abutments on the stress distribution in parafunctional loading: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Guler MS; Bekci ML
    Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):603-613. PubMed ID: 32568140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
    de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Stress Generated with Different Abutment Materials and Angulations under Axial and Oblique Loading in the Anterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Kapoor S; Rodrigues S; Mahesh M; Shetty T; Pai U; Saldanha S; Hedge P; Shenoy S
    Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():9205930. PubMed ID: 34899916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of immediately loaded implants according to the "All-on-Four" concept.
    Horita S; Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Murakami K; Imai Y; Kirita T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):123-132. PubMed ID: 27615425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
    Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Dayan SC; Geckili O
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Nov; 24(14):1606-1617. PubMed ID: 33798003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.