These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34084758)

  • 1. Comparison of surface topography of low-friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires using atomic force microscopy.
    Alsabti NI; Bourauel CP; Talic NF
    J Orthod Sci; 2021; 10():2. PubMed ID: 34084758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of static friction and surface topography of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires: An in-vitro study.
    Alsabti N; Talic N
    Saudi Dent J; 2021 Jul; 33(5):268-275. PubMed ID: 34194190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance of Connecticut New Arch Wires, Stainless Steel and Titanium Molybdenum Alloy Archwires Against Different Brackets.
    Suryavanshi S; Lingareddy U; Ahmed N; Neelakantappa KK; Sidiqha N; Minz M
    Cureus; 2019 Nov; 11(11):e6131. PubMed ID: 31886067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires : An in vitro study.
    Alsabti N; Bourauel C; Talic N
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jul; 82(4):218-225. PubMed ID: 33263771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires.
    Verstrynge A; Van Humbeeck J; Willems G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):460-70. PubMed ID: 17045145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the Surface Characteristics of Stainless Steel, TMA, Timolium, and Titanium-niobium Wires: An in vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Babu KP; Keerthi VN; Madathody D; Prasanna AL; Gopinath V; Kumar MS; Kumar AN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 May; 17(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 27443362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of ion-implantation on surface characteristics of nickel titanium and titanium molybdenum alloy arch wires.
    Krishnan M; Saraswathy S; Sukumaran K; Abraham KM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 24047831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
    Prososki RR; Bagby MD; Erickson LC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 1927985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface roughness of orthodontic wires via atomic force microscopy, laser specular reflectance, and profilometry.
    Bourauel C; Fries T; Drescher D; Plietsch R
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Feb; 20(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 9558768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):300-12. PubMed ID: 2220691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy.
    D'Antò V; Rongo R; Ametrano G; Spagnuolo G; Manzo P; Martina R; Paduano S; Valletta R
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):922-8. PubMed ID: 22339276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study.
    Juvvadi SR; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Chitharanjan AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 21055604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative friction of orthodontic wires under dry and wet conditions.
    Stannard JG; Gau JM; Hanna MA
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 3459362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of surface roughness on the coefficients of friction in model orthodontic systems.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ
    J Biomech; 1990; 23(9):913-25. PubMed ID: 2211736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corrosion resistance of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, titanium molybdenum alloy, and ion-implanted titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in acidic fluoride-containing artificial saliva: An
    Pulikkottil VJ; Chidambaram S; Bejoy PU; Femin PK; Paul P; Rishad M
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2016 Oct; 8(Suppl 1):S96-S99. PubMed ID: 27829756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire.
    Drescher D; Bourauel C; Schumacher HA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Nov; 96(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 2816839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel.
    Sheibaninia A; Salehi A; Asatourian A
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Jan; 9(1):e84-e90. PubMed ID: 28149469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
    Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.