BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34085328)

  • 1. Evaluation of Weighted Diffusion Subtraction for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Sato T; Isoda H; Fujimoto K; Furuta A; Fujimoto M; Ito K; Kobayashi T; Nakamoto Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 34085328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.
    Liu Y; Wang S; Xu G; Zhou B; Zhang Y; Ye B; Xiang L; Zhang Y; Xu H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 58(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 36773016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DWI of the prostate: Comparison of a faster diagonal acquisition to standard three-scan trace acquisition.
    Corcuera-Solano I; Wagner M; Hectors S; Lewis S; Titelbaum N; Stemmer A; Rastinehad A; Tewari A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1767-1775. PubMed ID: 28301097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
    Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
    Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
    Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Tavakoli AA; Hielscher T; Badura P; Görtz M; Kuder TA; Gnirs R; Schwab C; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
    Radiology; 2023 Jan; 306(1):186-199. PubMed ID: 35972360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
    Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience.
    Byun J; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):577-586. PubMed ID: 32045072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
    Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
    Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of T
    Klingebiel M; Schimmöller L; Weiland E; Franiel T; Jannusch K; Kirchner J; Hilbert T; Strecker R; Arsov C; Wittsack HJ; Albers P; Antoch G; Ullrich T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Aug; 56(2):413-422. PubMed ID: 35038203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Kong X; Niver BE; Berkman DS; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21178056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation: Diagnostic potential of a non-contrast-enhanced bi-parametric approach enhanced with relaxometry measurements.
    Arita Y; Akita H; Fujiwara H; Hashimoto M; Shigeta K; Kwee TC; Yoshida S; Kosaka T; Okuda S; Oya M; Jinzaki M
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100403. PubMed ID: 35242886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer.
    Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Haas M; Cash H; Miller K; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Kaufmann D; Rotzinger R; Lee CH; Asbach P; Hamm B; Penzkofer T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4262-4271. PubMed ID: 32219507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Luminal Water Imaging: Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and PI-RADS for Characterization of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
    Hectors SJ; Said D; Gnerre J; Tewari A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jul; 52(1):271-279. PubMed ID: 31961049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DWI-related texture analysis for prostate cancer: differences in correlation with histological aggressiveness and data repeatability between peripheral and transition zones.
    Tsuruta C; Hirata K; Kudo K; Masumori N; Hatakenaka M
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2022 Jan; 6(1):1. PubMed ID: 35018507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.