388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34085497)
1. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 37789708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.
Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Gotsis S; Bokhary A; Sicilia E; Kudara Y; Bedrossian A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Gotsis S; Chen YW; Vazouras K; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guided implant scanning: A procedure for improving the accuracy of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Perales-Padilla P; Perales-Pulido P; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):135-139. PubMed ID: 31761274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners.
Di Fiore A; Meneghello R; Graiff L; Savio G; Vigolo P; Monaco C; Stellini E
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 31072730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Workflow to Merge an Intraoral Scan and CBCT of Edentulous Maxilla: A Technical Report.
Carosi P; Ferrigno N; De Renzi G; Laureti M
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):730-732. PubMed ID: 32608078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A complete digital approach for facially generated full arch diagnostic wax up, guided surgery, and implant-supported interim prosthesis by integrating 3D facial scanning, intraoral scan and CBCT.
Amin SA; Hann S; Elsheikh AK; Boltchi F; Zandinejad A
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):90-93. PubMed ID: 36169659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy.
Revilla-León M; Lanis A; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Gallucci GO
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):150-164. PubMed ID: 37586762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital verification and correction of digital intraoral scans for fixed implant rehabilitation of edentulous arches: A dental technique.
Negreiros WM; Chanting Sun T; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):395-399. PubMed ID: 34229898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study.
Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Solaberrieta E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1250-1258. PubMed ID: 31610069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners.
Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans.
Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M
J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body.
Ntovas P; Spanopoulou M; Martin W; Sykaras N
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):475-480. PubMed ID: 36244761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
