These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34086715)

  • 21. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.
    Nielsen JD; Madsen KH; Puonti O; Siebner HR; Bauer C; Madsen CG; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():587-598. PubMed ID: 29518567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of multiple-sphere head models for MEG source localization.
    Lalancette M; Quraan M; Cheyne D
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5621-35. PubMed ID: 21828900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data.
    Neymotin SA; Daniels DS; Caldwell B; McDougal RA; Carnevale NT; Jas M; Moore CI; Hines ML; Hämäläinen M; Jones SR
    Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31967544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
    Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ERPWAVELAB a toolbox for multi-channel analysis of time-frequency transformed event related potentials.
    Mørup M; Hansen LK; Arnfred SM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Apr; 161(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 17204335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Finite Element Solution of the Forward Problem in EEG for Multipolar Sources.
    Beltrachini L
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Mar; 27(3):368-377. PubMed ID: 30561347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Symmetric BEM formulation for the M/EEG forward problem.
    Adde G; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Kybic J; Papadopoulo T
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():524-35. PubMed ID: 15344485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Source analysis of median nerve stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials and fields using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4903-6. PubMed ID: 23367027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
    Gençer NG; Acar CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.
    Litvak V; Mattout J; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Henson R; Kilner J; Barnes G; Oostenveld R; Daunizeau J; Flandin G; Penny W; Friston K
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():852961. PubMed ID: 21437221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.
    Gramfort A; Luessi M; Larson E; Engemann DA; Strohmeier D; Brodbeck C; Parkkonen L; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():446-60. PubMed ID: 24161808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EasyMEG: An easy-to-use toolbox for MEG analysis.
    Yang C; Wu W; Nie Y; Wang Q; Ren J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 186():105199. PubMed ID: 31743827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving the MEG and the Combined MEG/EEG Forward Problem.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Bornfleth H; Oostenveld R; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():30. PubMed ID: 29456487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anatomically constrained minimum variance beamforming applied to EEG.
    Murzin V; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 21915671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.