These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34086982)

  • 1. Thickness accuracy of virtually designed patient-specific implants for large neurocranial defects.
    Wittner C; Borowski M; Pirl L; Kastner J; Schrempf A; Schäfer U; Trieb K; Senck S
    J Anat; 2021 Oct; 239(4):755-770. PubMed ID: 34086982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Custom implant design for large cranial defects.
    Marreiros FM; Heuzé Y; Verius M; Unterhofer C; Freysinger W; Recheis W
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2217-2230. PubMed ID: 27358081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.
    Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Cornelius CP; Metzger MC; Ellis E; Probst F; Semper-Hogg W; Gass M; Schlager S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(4):519-529. PubMed ID: 29080945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD/CAM-manipulated CT-data.
    Eufinger H; Wehmöller M; Machtens E; Heuser L; Harders A; Kruse D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Jun; 23(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7673445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design.
    Li J; Gsaxner C; Pepe A; Morais A; Alves V; von Campe G; Wallner J; Egger J
    Sci Data; 2021 Jan; 8(1):36. PubMed ID: 33514740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) titanium implants for cranial and craniofacial defect reconstruction].
    Scholz M; Eufinger H; Wehmöller M; Heuser L; Harders A
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 1997; 58(3):105-10. PubMed ID: 9446459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided implant design for the restoration of cranial defects.
    Chen X; Xu L; Li X; Egger J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):4199. PubMed ID: 28646207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the Accuracy of PEEK Implants for Cranioplasty in Comparison to Their Patient Specific Surgical Plan?
    Wandell A; Papanastassiou A; Tarasiewicz I; Miller M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jan; 81(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 36202213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cranioplasty with individual carbon fibre reinforced polymere (CFRP) medical grade implants based on CAD/CAM technique.
    Saringer W; Nöbauer-Huhmann I; Knosp E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2002 Nov; 144(11):1193-203. PubMed ID: 12434176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted prefabrication of individual craniofacial implants.
    Eufinger H; Saylor B
    AORN J; 2001 Nov; 74(5):648-54; quiz 655-6, 658-62. PubMed ID: 11725443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D surface accuracy of CAD generated skull defect contour.
    Winder RJ; McKnight W; McRitchie I; Montgomery D; Wulf J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():574-6. PubMed ID: 16404124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective study on cranioplasty with individual carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) implants produced by means of stereolithography.
    Wurm G; Tomancok B; Holl K; Trenkler J
    Surg Neurol; 2004 Dec; 62(6):510-21. PubMed ID: 15576119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer aided design of large-format prefabricated cranial plates.
    Dean D; Min KJ; Bond A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):819-32. PubMed ID: 14600623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: A new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects.
    Schepers RH; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Stenekes MW; Kraeima J; Roodenburg JL; Reintsema H; Witjes MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 25911122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-Specific Implant in Prosthetic Craniofacial Reconstruction: First Report of a Novel Technique With Far-Reaching Perspective.
    Toso SM; Menzel K; Motzkus Y; Adolphs N; Hoffmeister B; Raguse JD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2133-5. PubMed ID: 26468797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thickness and design features of clinical cranial implants-what should automated methods strive to replicate?
    Fishman Z; Mainprize JG; Edwards G; Antonyshyn O; Hardisty M; Whyne CM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2024 Apr; 19(4):747-756. PubMed ID: 38430381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interest of a 3D custom-made implant in the reconstruction of bone defects of the cranial vault.
    Duteille F; Chavoin JP; Leyx P; Samarut E
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2024 Mar; 69(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 37516637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cranioplasty using computer-designed implants (preliminary report)].
    Gulyás G; Pulay G; Volant M; Bárdosi T; Farkas G; Juharosi Z
    Orv Hetil; 1995 Oct; 136(44):2393-7. PubMed ID: 7478484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone facial implants in a computer-aided planning workflow.
    Guevara-Rojas G; Figl M; Schicho K; Seemann R; Traxler H; Vacariu A; Carbon CC; Ewers R; Watzinger F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1801-12. PubMed ID: 24679957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual reconstruction of modern and fossil hominoid crania: consequences of reference sample choice.
    Senck S; Bookstein FL; Benazzi S; Kastner J; Weber GW
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 May; 298(5):827-41. PubMed ID: 25689596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.