These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34087339)

  • 1. Comparison of eleven in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
    Dundon WG; Settypalli TBK; Spiegel K; Steinrigl A; Revilla-Fernández S; Schmoll F; Naletoski I; Lamien CE; Cattoli G
    J Virol Methods; 2021 Sep; 295():114200. PubMed ID: 34087339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, correlation and inter-assay agreement of eight diagnostic in vitro assays for the detection of African swine fever virus.
    Auer A; Settypalli TBK; Mouille B; Angot A; De Battisti C; Lamien CE; Cattoli G
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2022 Sep; 69(5):e3231-e3238. PubMed ID: 35189029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 N gene real-time RT-PCR targets and commercially available mastermixes.
    Brown JR; O'Sullivan DM; Shah D; Atkinson L; Pereira RPA; Whale AS; Busby EJ; Huggett JF; Harris K
    J Virol Methods; 2021 Sep; 295():114215. PubMed ID: 34166701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.
    Banko A; Petrovic G; Miljanovic D; Loncar A; Vukcevic M; Despot D; Cirkovic A
    Viruses; 2021 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 34372527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative effects of viral-transport-medium heat inactivation upon downstream SARS-CoV-2 detection in patient samples.
    Thompson JL; Downie Ruiz Velasco A; Cardall A; Tarbox R; Richardson J; Clarke G; Lister M; Howson-Wells HC; Fleming VM; Khakh M; Sloan T; Duckworth N; Walsh S; Denning C; McClure CP; Benest AV; Seedhouse CH
    J Med Microbiol; 2021 Mar; 70(3):. PubMed ID: 33734960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of six nucleic acid amplification kits for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection.
    Wu S; Shi X; Chen Q; Jiang Y; Zuo L; Wang L; Jiang M; Lin Y; Fang S; Peng B; Wu W; Liu H; Zhang R; Kwan PSL; Hu Q
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2021 May; 20(1):38. PubMed ID: 34022903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of three extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays: A feasible alternative approach with low technical requirements.
    Visseaux B; Collin G; Houhou-Fidouh N; Le Hingrat Q; Ferré VM; Damond F; Ichou H; Descamps D; Charpentier C
    J Virol Methods; 2021 May; 291():114086. PubMed ID: 33577957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Various Alternative Economical and High Throughput SARS-CoV-2 Testing Methods within Resource-Limited Settings.
    Duma Z; Ramsuran V; Chuturgoon AA; Edward VA; Naidoo P; Mkhize-Kwitshana ZL
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into account.
    Malecki M; Luesebrink J; Wendel AF; Mattner F
    J Virol Methods; 2021 Sep; 295():114202. PubMed ID: 34087340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of seven commercial RT-PCR kits for COVID-19 testing in pooled clinical specimens.
    Garg A; Ghoshal U; Patel SS; Singh DV; Arya AK; Vasanth S; Pandey A; Srivastava N
    J Med Virol; 2021 Apr; 93(4):2281-2286. PubMed ID: 33230819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the commercially available LightMix® Modular E-gene kit using clinical and proficiency testing specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
    Yip CC; Sridhar S; Cheng AK; Leung KH; Choi GK; Chen JH; Poon RW; Chan KH; Wu AK; Chan HS; Chau SK; Chung TW; To KK; Tsang OT; Hung IF; Cheng VC; Yuen KY; Chan JF
    J Clin Virol; 2020 Aug; 129():104476. PubMed ID: 32516739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation and verification of the GeneFinder™ COVID-19 Plus RealAmp kit on the ELITe InGenius® instrument.
    Gard L; Fliss MA; Bosma F; Ter Veen D; Niesters HGM
    J Virol Methods; 2022 Feb; 300():114378. PubMed ID: 34838535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance verification of five commercial RT-qPCR diagnostic kits for SARS-CoV-2.
    Yang M; Cao S; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Zheng R; Li Y; Zhou J; Zong C; Cao D; Qin X
    Clin Chim Acta; 2022 Jan; 525():46-53. PubMed ID: 34902345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Different Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Methods for Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: Exploratory Study.
    Länsivaara A; Lehto KM; Hyder R; Janhonen ES; Lipponen A; Heikinheimo A; Pitkänen T; Oikarinen S;
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Aug; 10():e53175. PubMed ID: 39158943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to choose the right real-time RT-PCR primer sets for the SARS-CoV-2 genome detection?
    Anantharajah A; Helaers R; Defour JP; Olive N; Kabera F; Croonen L; Deldime F; Vaerman JL; Barbée C; Bodéus M; Scohy A; Verroken A; Rodriguez-Villalobos H; Kabamba-Mukadi B
    J Virol Methods; 2021 Sep; 295():114197. PubMed ID: 34033854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and Evaluation of AccuPower COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples.
    Suh IB; Lim J; Kim HS; Rhim G; Kim H; Kim H; Lee SM; Park HS; Song HJ; Hong M; Shin GS; Kim MJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263341. PubMed ID: 35143538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis with Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) technology and real-time PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection using various nasopharyngeal swabs in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron.
    Li S; Zhang Y; Tong P; Yang W
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0305289. PubMed ID: 39106263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of a dual-target real-time RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 diagnosis and assessment of performance in pooled saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples.
    Yip CCY; Leung KH; Ng ACK; Chan KH; To KKW; Chan JFW; Hung IFN; Cheng VCC; Sridhar S
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2021 Jul; 21(7):741-747. PubMed ID: 34014785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of three commercially available one step RT-PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in resource limited settings.
    Sisay A; Abera A; Dufera B; Endrias T; Tasew G; Tesfaye A; Hartnack S; Beyene D; Desta AF
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262178. PubMed ID: 35051204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resilient SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics workflows including viral heat inactivation.
    Lista MJ; Matos PM; Maguire TJA; Poulton K; Ortiz-Zapater E; Page R; Sertkaya H; Ortega-Prieto AM; Scourfield E; O'Byrne AM; Bouton C; Dickenson RE; Ficarelli M; Jimenez-Guardeño JM; Howard M; Betancor G; Galao RP; Pickering S; Signell AW; Wilson H; Cliff P; Kia Ik MT; Patel A; MacMahon E; Cunningham E; Doores K; Agromayor M; Martin-Serrano J; Perucha E; Mischo HE; Shankar-Hari M; Batra R; Edgeworth J; Zuckerman M; Malim MH; Neil S; Martinez-Nunez RT
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256813. PubMed ID: 34525109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.